Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21269287›Full record

ArticleEpilepsia2011

Remission and relapse in a drug-resistant epilepsy population followed prospectively.

Brian Callaghan, Malka Schlesinger, William Rodemer, John Pollard, Dale Hesdorffer, W Allen Hauser, Jacqueline French

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Epilepsia, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03475225 (Effect of the Treatment of Vitamin D Deficiency in Drug-resistant Epilepsy), which is not on this map. Cited by 54 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
54citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03475225 phase3completednot on this mapstarted 2018, after this paper: background citation

Effect of the Treatment of Vitamin D Deficiency in Drug-resistant Epilepsy

TypeinterventionalSponsorCentre Hospitalier St AnneRan2018 to 2020Enrolled88ConditionsDrug Resistant EpilepsyArmsCholecalciferol, Placebo Oral
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

54 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Identifying the mechanism of action of the Kv7 channel opener, retigabine in the treatment of epilepsy.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2023
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Brian CallaghanUniversity of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA. bcallagh@med.umich.edu
Malka Schlesinger
William Rodemer
John Pollard
Dale Hesdorffer
W Allen Hauser
Jacqueline French

Funding

Consequences of Prolonged Febrile Seizures in ChildhoodR01NS043209 · NINDS · MONTEFIORE MEDICAL CENTER (BRONX, NY) · PI SHINNAR, SHLOMO · 2003 to 2012
$21.5M
Consequences of Prolonged Febrile Seizures in ChildhoodR37NS043209 · NINDS · ALBERT EINSTEIN COLLEGE OF MEDICINE, INC · PI SHINNAR, SHLOMO · 2013 to 2019
$11.4M
Traumatic Brain Injury Clinical Trials Network-DCCU01HD042823 · NICHD · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI FRIEDEWALD, WILLIAM T · 2002 to 2011
$10.0M
TRAINING IN CLINICAL AND BASIC NEUROSCIENCET32NS007222 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI Henry L Paulson · 1985 to 2026
$8.0M
Long-term outcomes of childhood-onset epilepsyR37NS031146 · NINDS · NORTHERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY · PI BERG, ANNE T. · 2007 to 2013
$7.1M
RISK AND PREDICTORS OF INTRACTABLE EPILEPSY IN CHILDRENR01NS031146 · NINDS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI BERG, ANNE T. · 1993 to 2006
$4.7M
NCCDPHP CDC HHS DP002209NICHD NIH HHS HD042823NICHD NIH HHS U01 HD042823NINDS NIH HHS NS043209NINDS NIH HHS NS31146NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS031146NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS043209NINDS NIH HHS R37 NS031146NINDS NIH HHS R37 NS043209NINDS NIH HHS T32 NS007222PHS HHS MC00007
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeWe investigated the cumulative probability of seizure remission and relapse in an adult population with drug-resistant epilepsy and frequent seizures. In addition, we determined clinical predictors of remission and relapse in this population.

methodsIN 2003, we identified 246 patients at a single center with drug-resistant epilepsy defined as at least one seizure per month and failure of at least two antiepileptic drugs. These patients were followed prospectively (cohort design). We examined the cumulative probability of seizure remission and relapse in this population using Kaplan-Meier methodology. Clinical predictors of remission and relapse were also evaluated using Cox regression analysis. KEY

findingsThe estimated cumulative probability of 12-month seizure remission was 34.6% at 7 years in the entire population and 33.4% when limited to those without surgery. The risk for relapse after a 12-month period of seizure remission was 71.2% at 5 years. Negative predictors of seizure remission included developmental delay, symptomatic generalized epilepsy syndrome, duration of intractability, and number of antiepileptic drugs failed. Localization-related epilepsy was the only negative predictor of relapse. SIGNIFICANCE: Among patients with drug-resistant epilepsy, 5% per year enter seizure remission even with a follow-up of 6 years. However, a substantial proportion of these patients relapse after the first year following a remission. The large proportion of patients entering a significant remission gives these patients hope; however, caution should be advised when discussing the likelihood of future seizures.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAnticonvulsantsChildCohort StudiesDrug Resistance, MultipleEpilepsyFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateMaleMiddle AgedProbabilityAnticonvulsants

Identifiers

PMID21269287
PMCPMC3147304

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.