Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21268056›Full record

ReviewJournal of cellular biochemistry2011

Stem and progenitor cells for neurological repair: minor issues, major hurdles, and exciting opportunities for paracrine-based therapeutics.

Issei S Shimada, Jeffrey L Spees

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of cellular biochemistry, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Issei S ShimadaDepartment of Medicine, Stem Cell Core, University of Vermont, Colchester, Vermont 05446, USA.
Jeffrey L Spees
University of Vermont · US

Funding

Proteomics Core for Neuroscience P20 RR16435P20RR016435 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF VERMONT &ST AGRIC COLLEGE · PI SPEES, JEFFREY L · 2001 to 2010
$23.5M
Center for Neuroscience ExcellenceP30GM103498 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF VERMONT & ST AGRIC COLLEGE · PI PARSONS, RODNEY L · 2012 to 2015
$4.3M
Factors Responsible for Cardiac Preservation Conferred by Adult Marrow Stem CellsR01HL085210 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF VERMONT & ST AGRIC COLLEGE · PI SPEES, JEFFREY L · 2008 to 2012
$1.7M
NCRR NIH HHS P20 RR016435NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL085210NIGMS NIH HHS P30 GM103498
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The transplantation of cultured stem and progenitor cells is a key element in the rapidly growing field of regenerative medicine. Based on their ability to rescue and/or repair injured tissue and partially restore organ function, multiple types of stem/progenitor cells have already entered into clinical trials. However, despite several decades of intense research, the goal to apply culture-expanded stem/progenitor cells in a manner that can effectively replace cells after injury has yet to be realized. Many sources of potentially useful cells are available, but something is clearly missing. In addition, recent studies suggest that paracrine effects of secreted or released factors are responsible for most of the benefits observed after cell transplantation, rather than direct cell replacement. These data call into question the need for cell transplantation for many types of therapy, in particular for acute injuries such as myocardial infarction and stroke. In this review, we examine current progress in the area of cell transplantation and minor issues and major hurdles regarding the clinical application of different cell types. We discuss the "paracrine hypothesis" for the action of transplanted stem/progenitor cells as an opportunity to identify defined combinations of biomolecules to rescue and/or repair tissues after injury. Although many of the concepts in this review will apply to multiple injury/repair systems, we will focus primarily on stem/progenitor cell-based treatments for neurological disorders and stroke.

Indexed as

AnimalsHumansNervous System DiseasesStem CellsStem Cell TransplantationStroke

Identifiers

PMID21268056
PMCPMC3175770
OpenAlexW2064104066

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.