Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21267650›Full record

ArticleEcotoxicology (London, England)2011

Honeybee tracking with microchips: a new methodology to measure the effects of pesticides.

Axel Decourtye, James Devillers, Pierrick Aupinel, François Brun, Camille Bagnis, Julie Fourrier, Monique Gauthier

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Ecotoxicology (London, England), 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
24.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 132 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. A review of short-term weather impacts on honey production.International journal of biometeorology · 2025
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Fipronil pesticide as a suspect in historical mass mortalities of honey bees.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2018
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Axel DecourtyeACTA, UMT PrADE, UMR 406, Site Agroparc, Avignon, France. axel.decourtye@acta.asso.fr
James Devillers
Pierrick Aupinel
François Brun
Camille Bagnis
Julie Fourrier
Monique Gauthier
AGroecologies, Innovations & Ruralities · FRAssociation pour l'Utilisation du Rein Artificiel dans la région Lyonnaise · FRCentre de Recherches sur la Cognition Animale · FRInstitut Mérieux (France) · FRLaboratoire Bourguignon des Matériaux et Procédés · FRVetAgro Sup · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Losses of foraging bees are sometimes attributed to altered flight pattern between a meliferous plant treated with an insecticide and the hive. Only a limited number of studies has investigated the impact of pesticides on homing flight due to the difficulty of measuring the flight time between the food source and the hive. Monitoring the flights of the foraging bees needs their individual identification. The number of bees monitored simultaneously and the time span during which observations can be made limit most of the monitoring techniques. However, techniques of automatic tracking and identification of individuals have the potential to revolutionize the study of the ecotoxicological effects of xenobiotics on the bee behaviors. Radio Frequency Identification (RFID) offer numerous advantages such as an unlimited number of codes, a large number of simultaneous recording, and a quick reading, especially through materials (e.g., wood). The aim of this study was to show how the RFID device can be used to study the effects of pesticides on both the behavioral traits and the lifespan of bees. In this context, we have developed a method under tunnel to automatically record the displacements of foragers individualized with RFID tags and to detect the alteration of the flight pattern between an artificial feeder and the hive. Fipronil was selected as test substance due to the lack of information on the effects of this insecticide on the foraging behavior of free-flying bees. We showed that oral treatment of 0.3 ng of fipronil per bee (LD50/20) reduced the number of foraging trips. The strengths of our approach were briefly discussed.

Indexed as

Radio Frequency Identification DeviceAnimalsBeesEnvironmental MonitoringFeeding BehaviorInsecticidesModels, BiologicalPyrazolesRemote Sensing TechnologyfipronilInsecticidesPyrazoles

Identifiers

PMID21267650
OpenAlexW2055869401

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.