Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21266769›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of clinical investigation2011

The cautionary tale of side effects of chronic Notch1 inhibition.

Sandra W Ryeom

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComment
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of clinical investigation, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Signaling pathways and targeted therapy for pulmonary hypertension.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. The role of metabolism in cellular quiescence.Journal of cell science · 2023
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Cell of origin in biliary tract cancers and clinical implications.JHEP reports : innovation in hepatology · 2021
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Antisense oligonucleotides targetingThe Journal of biological chemistry · 2020
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Notch in skeletal physiology and disease.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2018
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sandra W RyeomDepartment of Cancer Biology, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Abramson Family Cancer Research Institute, 311 BRB, 421 Curie Boulevard, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19106, USA. sryeom@upenn.edu
UPMC Hillman Cancer Center · US

Funding

NCI NIH HHS R01CA552679
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aberrant Notch1 signaling is implicated in several types of cancer. Therefore, Notch signaling pathways are important anticancer targets. Pan-Notch receptor inhibition is associated with numerous complications; thus, selective Notch receptor inhibition has been pursued. Studies have shown minimal side effects with short-term blockade of either Notch1 or its ligand Delta-like 4, but long-term side effects were not investigated. In this issue of the JCI, Liu et al. use mouse models to demonstrate the consequence of long-term Notch1 inhibition. They present evidence that chronic Notch1 inhibition leads to vascular tumors in the liver and decreased survival, which suggests that Notch1 therapies should be reevaluated.

Indexed as

AnimalsHumansIntracellular Signaling Peptides and ProteinsMembrane ProteinsMiceReceptor, Notch1Signal TransductionVascular Neoplasmsdelta proteinIntracellular Signaling Peptides and ProteinsMembrane ProteinsReceptor, Notch1

Identifiers

PMID21266769
PMCPMC3026750
OpenAlexW2015200964

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.