Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21264656›Full record

ArticleJapanese journal of radiology2011

Peristalsis gap sign at cine magnetic resonance imaging for diagnosing strangulated small bowel obstruction: feasibility study.

Taro Takahara, Thomas C Kwee, Hiroki Haradome, Kei Aoki, Hiroyoshi Matsuoka, Akihisa Nakamura, Keita Honya, Mitsuyuki Takahashi, Tomohiro Yamashita, Peter R Luijten and 1 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Japanese journal of radiology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. MR Imaging-based Evaluation of Mesenteric Ischemia Caused by Strangulated Small Bowel Obstruction and Mesenteric Venous Occlusion: An Experimental Study Using Rabbits.Magnetic resonance in medical sciences : MRMS : an official journal of Japan Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine · 2020
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Taro TakaharaDepartment of Radiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, Utrecht, The Netherlands. tarorin@rr.iij4u.or.jp
Thomas C Kwee
Hiroki Haradome
Kei Aoki
Hiroyoshi Matsuoka
Akihisa Nakamura
Keita Honya
Mitsuyuki Takahashi
Tomohiro Yamashita
Peter R Luijten
Yutaka Imai
Kyorin University · JPHeidelberg University · DETokai University · JPYokohama Minami Kyosai Hospital · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe aim of this study was to determine the feasibility of cine magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for diagnosing strangulated small bowel obstruction (SBO). MATERIALS AND

methodsThis study included 38 patients with clinically confirmed SBO who had undergone cine MRI. Cine MRI scans were evaluated regarding the presence of the "peristalsis gap sign" (referring to an akinetic or severely hypokinetic closed loop), indicating strangulation. Computed tomography (CT) was performed in 34 of 38 patients with (n = 25) or without (n = 9) contrast enhancement. CT images were evaluated using a combination of criteria (presence of hyperattenuation, poor contrast enhancement, mesenteric edema, wall thickening, massive ascites) indicating strangulation. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of cine MRI and CT for the diagnosis of strangulation were calculated and compared using surgical findings and the clinical course as the reference standard.

resultsSensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV of cine MRI were 100%, 92.9%, 83.3%, and 100%, respectively; and those of CT (of which 26.5% was performed without contrast enhancement) were 66.7%, 92.0%, 75.0%, and 88.5%, respectively. There was no significant difference in diagnostic accuracy between the two methods (P = 0.375).

conclusionCine MRI is a feasible and promising technique for diagnosing strangulation.

Indexed as

Intestine, SmallPeristalsisAdultAgedAged, 80 and overContrast MediaFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedIntestinal ObstructionMagnetic Resonance Imaging, CineMaleMiddle AgedPredictive Value of TestsSensitivity and SpecificityContrast Media

Identifiers

PMID21264656
OpenAlexW1979498662

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.