Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21264507›Full record

ArticleBreast cancer research and treatment2011

Genome-wide copy number alterations in subtypes of invasive breast cancers in young white and African American women.

Lenora W M Loo, Yinghui Wang, Erin M Flynn, Mary Jo Lund, Erin J Aiello Bowles, Diana S M Buist, Jonathan M Liff, Elaine W Flagg, Ralph J Coates, J William Eley and 2 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Breast cancer research and treatment, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Genomic Alterations during theMolecular cancer research : MCR · 2021
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Health and Racial Disparity in Breast Cancer.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2019
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Assessing the Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Breast Cancer Mortality in the United States.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2017
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Lenora W M LooDivision of Human Biology, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, 1100 Fairview Ave. N C1-015, Seattle, WA 98109, USA.
Yinghui Wang
Erin M Flynn
Mary Jo Lund
Erin J Aiello Bowles
Diana S M Buist
Jonathan M Liff
Elaine W Flagg
Ralph J Coates
J William Eley
Li Hsu
Peggy L Porter
Fred Hutch Cancer Center · USEmory University · USCenters for Disease Control and Prevention · USGroup Health Cooperative · USKaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute · USNational Center for HIV/AIDS Viral Hepatitis STD and TB Prevention · US

Funding

Statistical Methods in Genetic EpidemiologyR01AG014358 · NIA · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI HSU, LI · 2002 to 2013
$2.4M
Gene Copy Number Changes and Breast Cancer SurvivalR01CA098415 · NCI · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI PORTER, PEGGY L. · 2004 to 2008
$2.2M
RACIAL DIFFERENCES IN BREAST CANCER SURVIVALR01CA064292 · NCI · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI ELEY, JOHN W · 1996 to 2000
$461k
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA064292NCI NIH HHS R01 CA098415NIA NIH HHS R01 AG014358
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genomic copy number alterations (CNA) are common in breast cancer. Identifying characteristic CNAs associated with specific breast cancer subtypes is a critical step in defining potential mechanisms of disease initiation and progression. We used genome-wide array comparative genomic hybridization to identify distinctive CNAs in breast cancer subtypes from 259 young (diagnosed with breast cancer at <55 years) African American (AA) and Caucasian American (CA) women originally enrolled in a larger population-based study. We compared the average frequency of CNAs across the whole genome for each breast tumor subtype and found that estrogen receptor (ER)-negative tumors had a higher average frequency of genome-wide gain (P < 0.0001) and loss (P = 0.02) compared to ER-positive tumors. Triple-negative (TN) tumors had a higher average frequency of genome-wide gain (P < 0.0001) and loss (P = 0.003) than non-TN tumors. No significant difference in CNA frequency was observed between HER2-positive and -negative tumors. We also identified previously unreported recurrent CNAs (frequency >40%) for TN breast tumors at 10q, 11p, 11q, 16q, 20p, and 20q. In addition, we report CNAs that differ in frequency between TN breast tumors of AA and CA women. This is of particular relevance because TN breast cancer is associated with higher mortality and young AA women have higher rates of TN breast tumors compared to CA women. These data support the possibility that higher overall frequency of genomic alteration events as well as specific focal CNAs in TN breast tumors might contribute in part to the poor breast cancer prognosis for young AA women.

Indexed as

Genome-Wide Association StudyAdultAge FactorsBlack or African AmericanBreast NeoplasmsCluster AnalysisComparative Genomic HybridizationDNA Copy Number VariationsFemaleGene FrequencyHumansMiddle AgedWhite PeopleYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID21264507
PMCPMC3224104
OpenAlexW2060734099

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.