Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21264501›Full record

ArticleJournal of genetic counseling2011

Ethical dilemmas in genetic testing: examples from the Cuban program for predictive diagnosis of hereditary ataxias.

Tania Cruz Mariño, Rubén Reynaldo Armiñán, Humberto Jorge Cedeño, José Miguel Laffita Mesa, Yanetza González Zaldivar, Raúl Aguilera Rodríguez, Miguel Velázquez Santos, Luis Enrique Almaguer Mederos, Milena Paneque Herrera, Luis Velázquez Pérez

Open access · bronzeAbstract readCase Reports
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of genetic counseling, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Tania Cruz MariñoPredictive Genetics Department, Center for Research and Rehabilitation of Hereditary Ataxias (CIRAH), Holguín, Cuba. taniacmarin@infomed.sld.cu
Rubén Reynaldo Armiñán
Humberto Jorge Cedeño
José Miguel Laffita Mesa
Yanetza González Zaldivar
Raúl Aguilera Rodríguez
Miguel Velázquez Santos
Luis Enrique Almaguer Mederos
Milena Paneque Herrera
Luis Velázquez Pérez
Universidade do Porto · PTUniversity of Holguín · CU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Predictive testing protocols are intended to help patients affected with hereditary conditions understand their condition and make informed reproductive choices. However, predictive protocols may expose clinicians and patients to ethical dilemmas that interfere with genetic counseling and the decision making process. This paper describes ethical dilemmas in a series of five cases involving predictive testing for hereditary ataxias in Cuba. The examples herein present evidence of the deeply controversial situations faced by both individuals at risk and professionals in charge of these predictive studies, suggesting a need for expanded guidelines to address such complexities.

Indexed as

Ethics, MedicalAdolescentAdultAtaxinsCubaFemaleGenetic Carrier ScreeningGenetic TestingHumansNerve Tissue ProteinsPedigreePredictive Value of TestsPrenatal DiagnosisSpinocerebellar DegenerationsTwins, MonozygoticAtaxinsNerve Tissue Proteins

Identifiers

PMID21264501
OpenAlexW2080500509

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.