Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21263296›Full record

ArticleAnnals of plastic surgery2011

Silk fibroin conduits: a cellular and functional assessment of peripheral nerve repair.

Amir Mahan Ghaznavi, Lauren E Kokai, Michael L Lovett, David L Kaplan, Kacey G Marra

Abstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of plastic surgery, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Neural responses to electrical stimulation on patterned silk films.Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A · 2013
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Amir Mahan GhaznaviDivision of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Lauren E Kokai
Michael L Lovett
David L Kaplan
Kacey G Marra

Funding

Translational Bioreactors - Engineering Complex TissuesP41EB002520 · NIBIB · TUFTS UNIVERSITY MEDFORD · PI KAPLAN, DAVID L. · 2004 to 2018
$16.7M
NIBIB NIH HHS EB002520NIBIB NIH HHS P41 EB002520
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Silk fibroin conduits were designed with appropriate porosity for peripheral nerve repair. The aim of this work was to use these conduits to examine cell inflammatory responses and functional recovery in a sciatic nerve defect model. A total of 45 randomized Lewis rats were used to create an 8-mm defect bridged by a silk guide, commercial collagen guide, or an autograft. After 1, 4, and 8 weeks, macrophage recruitment, percentage of newly formed collagen, number of myelinated axons, and gastrocnemius muscle mass were evaluated. Following 8 weeks, ED1+ cells in autograft and silk conduits decreased to <1% and 17% of week 1 values, respectively. Collagen formation revealed no difference for all measured time points, suggesting a similar foreign body response. Myelinated axon counts within the silk guide revealed a greater number of proximal spouts and distal connections than collagen guides. Gastrocnemius weights demonstrated a 27% decrease between silk and autografts after 8 weeks. This study demonstrates that, in addition to tailorable degradation rates, our silk conduits possess a favorable immunogenicity and remyelination capacity for nerve repair.

Indexed as

Biocompatible MaterialsFibroinsNerve RegenerationSilkAbsorbable ImplantsAnimalsDisease Models, AnimalGuided Tissue RegenerationMaterials TestingRandom AllocationRatsRats, Inbred LewRecovery of FunctionSciatic NeuropathyTissue EngineeringWound HealingBiocompatible MaterialsFibroinsSilk

Identifiers

PMID21263296
PMCPMC3090669

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.