Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21263054›Full record

ArticleAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy2011

Pharmacodynamics of razupenem (PZ601) studied in an in vitro pharmacokinetic model of infection.

Alasdair P MacGowan, Alan Noel, Sharon Tomaselli, Heather Elliott, Karen Bowker

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. New antibiotics for bad bugs: where are we?Annals of clinical microbiology and antimicrobials · 2013
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Alasdair P MacGowanBCARE, Department of Medical Microbiology, Lime Walk Building, Southmead Hospital, Westbury-on-Trym, Bristol BS10 5NB, United Kingdom. alasdair.macgowan@nbt.nhs.uk
Alan Noel
Sharon Tomaselli
Heather Elliott
Karen Bowker
University of Bristol · GBNorth Bristol NHS Trust · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Simulations of administration of razupenem at 1 g every 12 h by 1-h intravenous (i.v.) infusion were performed in an in vitro pharmacokinetic model of infection. The antibacterial effect of this razupenem dosing regimen against six strains of Staphylococcus aureus (one methicillin-sensitive S. aureus [MSSA] strain [MIC, 0.015 μg/ml] and five methicillin-resistant S. aureus [MRSA] strains [MIC range, 0.09 to 3 μg/ml]) and five strains of Enterobacteriaceae (three Escherichia coli strains [two containing extended-spectrum β-lactamases {ESBLs}] and two Enterobacter sp. strains [one with an AmpC enzyme and the other with a raised razupenem MIC; MIC range, 0.09 to 6 μg/ml]) was assessed. Against the MSSA and MRSA strains, razupenem produced a >3.5-log-unit reduction in viable count after 24 h. There were no changes in population profiles. In a second series of experiments, over 5 days there was rapid initial clearance of MRSA from the model followed by regrowth after 48 h. MRSA colonies appeared on 2× MIC recovery medium after 72 h with strain 33820 (MIC, 3.0 μg/ml) and at 120 h with strain 27706 (MIC, 1.5 μg/ml). Against E. coli and Enterobacter spp., razupenem produced a >3.5-log-unit reduction in bacterial counts for all strains except that with an MIC of 6 μg/ml, where razupenem had a notably poorer antibacterial effect. Population profiles were unchanged after 48 h of exposure to razupenem except for Enterobacter strain 34425 (MIC, 6.0 μg/ml), where colonies were recovered from media containing 2×, 4×, and 8× MIC. In dose-ranging studies with MRSA strains, the percentage of the dosing interval that the free drug concentration remained higher than the pathogen MIC (fT>MIC) for a 24-h bacteriostatic effect was 5.0% ± 1.4%, and that for a 1-log-unit reduction in count was 12.5% ± 5.8%. Population profiles indicated growth on 2× MIC recovery medium at fT>MIC values of 1 to 35% but not at a value of >35%. In a similar set of experiments with Enterobacteriaceae, the fT>MIC for a 24-h bacteriostatic effect was 34.2% ± 7.6% and that for a 1-log-unit reduction in count was 42.5% ± 7.8%. Population analysis profiles indicated growth on recovery media with 2×, 4×, and 8× MIC at fT>MICs in the range of 1 to 69% but rarely at values of ≥ 70%. In conclusion, razupenem at simulated human doses of 1 g i.v. every 12 h has a marked antibacterial effect on MSSA and MRSA strains with MICs of ≤ 3.0 μg/ml and Enterobacteriaceae with MICs of ≤ 0.4 μg/ml. fT>MIC targets of ≥ 35% for MRSA and ≥ 70% for Enterobacteriaceae should provide significant antibacterial effects combined with low risks of changing pathogen antibiotic population profiles.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsEnterobacteriaceaeMethicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureusMicrobial Sensitivity TestsStaphylococcal InfectionsStaphylococcus aureusAnti-Bacterial Agents

Identifiers

PMID21263054
PMCPMC3067199
OpenAlexW2114438938

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.