Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21263053›Full record

ArticleAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy2011

Antimicrobial susceptibilities and molecular epidemiology of clinical isolates of Clostridium difficile in taiwan.

Yi-Chun Lin, Yu-Tsung Huang, Pei-Jane Tsai, Tai-Fen Lee, Nan-Yao Lee, Chun-Hsing Liao, Shyr-Yi Lin, Wen-Chien Ko, Po-Ren Hsueh

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 48 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. The fitness connection of antibiotic resistance.Frontiers in microbiology · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Novel Antimicrobials for the Treatment ofFrontiers in medicine · 2018
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Molecular Characterization ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2018
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review of nemonoxacin with special focus on clinical development.Drug design, development and therapy · 2014
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Epidemiology of Clostridium difficile infection in Asia.Antimicrobial resistance and infection control · 2013
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Yi-Chun LinDepartment of Internal Medicine, Taipei Medical University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
Yu-Tsung Huang
Pei-Jane Tsai
Tai-Fen Lee
Nan-Yao Lee
Chun-Hsing Liao
Shyr-Yi Lin
Wen-Chien Ko
Po-Ren Hsueh
National Taiwan University Hospital · TWNational Cheng Kung University Hospital · TWTaipei Medical University · TWFar Eastern Memorial Hospital · TWNational Cheng Kung University · TW

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The antimicrobial susceptibility and virulence factors of Clostridium difficile clinical isolates in Taiwan have not previously been reported. One hundred and thirteen isolates were collected from two major teaching hospitals in Taiwan from 2001 to 2009. Molecular typing was performed by an automated repetitive extragenic palindromic sequence-based PCR (rep-PCR) method (DiversiLab; Bacterial Barcodes, Inc., Athens, GA) and PCR ribotyping. Detection of tcdA, tcdB, cdtA, and cdtB genes was performed using a multiplex PCR assay, and gyrA and gyrB genes of moxifloxacin-nonsusceptible isolates were sequenced. All isolates were susceptible to vancomycin and metronidazole. Ninety-five (84%) isolates were susceptible to moxifloxacin, and the MIC(90) for nemonoxacin was 4 μg/ml. Tigecycline showed favorable antibacterial activity (MIC(90) of 0.06 μg/ml). Thirteen rep-PCR types were identified as a predominant rep-PCR type (type A; non-North American pulsed-field gel electrophoresis type 1 [NAP1], -NAP7, or -NAP8) accounting for 52.2% (59 isolates). Nine of 18 moxifloxacin-nonsusceptible isolates belonged to the rep-PCR type A. The rep-PCR type A and C isolates were distinct from NAP1 (ribotype 027) and NAP8 (ribotype 078) as determined by PCR ribotyping. Seventy-four (65%) isolates harbored tcdA and tcdB, and 15 (13%) harbored cdtAB encoding binary toxin. Eleven isolates had a gene deletion in tcdC, including a 39-bp deletion (9 isolates) and an 18-bp deletion (2). In conclusion, dissemination of a predominant C. difficile clone in southern and northern Taiwan was noted. However, no NAP1 (ribotype 027) isolate could be discovered in this study.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsAza CompoundsBacterial ProteinsClostridioides difficileFluoroquinolonesGenotypeMetronidazoleMicrobial Sensitivity TestsMolecular EpidemiologyMoxifloxacinPolymerase Chain ReactionQuinolinesRibotypingTaiwanVancomycinAnti-Bacterial AgentsAza CompoundsBacterial ProteinsFluoroquinolonesMetronidazoleMoxifloxacinQuinolinesVancomycin

Identifiers

PMID21263053
PMCPMC3067156
OpenAlexW2144576160

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.