Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21263050›Full record

ArticleAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy2011

In vitro susceptibility of Madurella mycetomatis to posaconazole and terbinafine.

Alex van Belkum, Ahmed H Fahal, Wendy W J van de Sande

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.1field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 50 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Observational
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. In vitro susceptibility testing for black grain eumycetoma causative agents.Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene · 2021
    Article
  9. Development and Validation of anAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2021
    Article
  10. Diagnostic implications of mycetoma derived from Madurella pseudomycetomatis isolates from Mexico.Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV · 2020
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Mycetoma medical therapy.PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2014
    Review
  20. Madurella mycetomatis is highly susceptible to ravuconazole.PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2014
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Alex van BelkumErasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Department of Medical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, s-Gravendijkwal 230, 3015 GD Rotterdam, Netherlands.
Ahmed H Fahal
Wendy W J van de Sande
Erasmus MC · NLUniversity of Khartoum · SD

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Presently, therapy of eumycetoma in Sudan is still based on surgery combined with prolonged ketoconazole therapy. This usually results in a poor clinical outcome. To determine if posaconazole and terbinafine could offer better therapeutic alternatives, the in vitro susceptibilities of 34 Madurella mycetomatis strains were determined. It appeared that posaconazole was highly active against M. mycetomatis but terbinafine was only moderately active. Since posaconazole has an excellent safety profile, it might provide an important alternative in mycetoma therapy.

Indexed as

Antifungal AgentsItraconazoleKetoconazoleMadurellaMicrobial Sensitivity TestsNaphthalenesTerbinafineTriazolesAntifungal AgentsItraconazoleKetoconazoleNaphthalenesposaconazoleTerbinafineTriazoles

Identifiers

PMID21263050
PMCPMC3067195
OpenAlexW2168731956

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.