Trial reportPediatrics2011
Chlamydia screening among young women: individual- and provider-level differences in testing.
Trial report in Pediatrics, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed.
- Adolescent Chlamydia Screening in Pediatric Primary Care: A Quality Improvement Project.Journal of advanced nursing · 2025Article
- Article
- Global, regional, and national burden of chlamydial infection: a systematic analysis of incidence, prevalence, deaths, and DALYs with projections to 2046.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
- Sexually transmitted infection testing and diagnosis in adolescents and young adults with sickle cell disease.Pediatric blood & cancer · 2024Article
- A retrospective review of the rate of sexually transmitted infections in adolescents after universal screening protocol implementation in an urban United States clinic.Preventive medicine reports · 2024Article
- Racial and Ethnic Differences in Chlamydia and Gonorrhea Testing Locations Among Medicaid-Insured Youth.The Journal of adolescent health : official publication of the Society for Adolescent Medicine · 2024Article
- Adherence to Sexually Transmitted Infection Screening in Pregnancy.Journal of women's health (2002) · 2023Article
- Chlamydia Trachomatis/Neisseria Gonorrhea Retesting Among Adolescents and Young Adults in a Primary Care Network.The Journal of adolescent health : official publication of the Society for Adolescent Medicine · 2022Article
- Annual STI Testing Among Sexually Active Adolescents.Pediatrics · 2022Article
- Variability in Sexual History Documentation in a Primary Care Electronic Health Record System.The Journal of adolescent health : official publication of the Society for Adolescent Medicine · 2022Article
- Inequities inAmerican journal of public health · 2022Article
- Effect of screening young men forBMJ open · 2021Article
- Physician Adherence to Sexually Transmitted Infection Screening Guidelines in an OB/GYN Teaching Clinic in Hawai'i.Hawai'i journal of medicine & public health : a journal of Asia Pacific Medicine & Public Health · 2017Article
- Effectiveness of an Adaptation of the Project Connect Health Systems Intervention: Youth and Clinic-Level Findings.The Journal of school health · 2016Article
- Clinician adherence to recommendations for screening of adolescents for sexual activity and sexually transmitted infection/human immunodeficiency virus.The Journal of pediatrics · 2014Article
- Social comparison framing in health news and its effect on perceptions of group risk.Health communication · 2014Article
- Status of adolescent pelvic inflammatory disease management in the United States.Current opinion in obstetrics & gynecology · 2013Review
- Factors associated with screening for sexually transmitted infections.American journal of obstetrics and gynecology · 2012Article
- Growing Evidence Supports an Implementation Shift Toward Vaginal Sampling forAnnals of family medicineArticle
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveWe assessed differences in chlamydia screening rates according to race/ethnicity, insurance status, age, and previous sexually transmitted infection (STI) or pregnancy.
methodsA retrospective cohort study was performed using electronic medical record and billing data for women 14 to 25 years of age in 2002-2007, assessing differences in the odds of a chlamydia test being performed at that visit.
resultsAdjusted odds of a chlamydia test being performed were lower among women 14 to 15 years of age (odds ratio: 0.83 [95% confidence interval: 0.70-1.00]) and 20 to 25 years of age (20-21 years, odds ratio: 0.78 [95% confidence interval: 0.70-0.89]; 22-23 years, odds ratio: 0.76 [95% confidence interval: 0.67-0.87]; 24-25 years, odds ratio: 0.64 [95% confidence interval: 0.57-0.73]), compared with women 18 to 19 years of age. Black women had 3 times increased odds (odds ratio: 2.96 [95% confidence interval: 2.66-3.28]) and Hispanic women nearly 13 times increased odds (odds ratio: 12.89 [95% confidence interval: 10.85-15.30]) of testing, compared with white women. Women with public (odds ratio: 1.74 [95% confidence interval: 1.58-1.91]) and public pending (odds ratio: 6.85 [95% confidence interval: 5.13-9.15]) insurance had increased odds of testing, compared with women with private insurance. After first STI diagnosis, differences according to race/ethnicity persisted but were smaller; after first pregnancy, differences persisted.
conclusionsDespite recommendations to screen all sexually active young women for chlamydia, providers screened women differently according to age, race/ethnicity, and insurance status, although differences were reduced after first STI or pregnancy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.