Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21262850›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics2011

Synergistic interaction between the two mechanisms of action of tapentadol in analgesia.

W Schröder, T M Tzschentke, R Terlinden, J De Vry, U Jahnel, T Christoph, R J Tallarida

Erratum issuedAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 37 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Mixed-mechanism analgesics for mixed pain.Frontiers in medicine · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Effectiveness of tapentadol hydrochloride for treatment of orthopedic pain in dogs: A pilot study.The Canadian veterinary journal = La revue veterinaire canadienne · 2020
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

  • Erratum issued
  • Erratum issued
5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

W SchröderGlobal Preclinical Research and Development, Department of Pharmacology, Grünenthal GmbH, Zieglerstrasse 6, 52078 Aachen, Germany. wolfgang.schroeder@grunenthal.com
T M Tzschentke
R Terlinden
J De Vry
U Jahnel
T Christoph
R J Tallarida

Funding

Pilot Projects Core (PPC)P30DA013429 · NIDA · TEMPLE UNIV OF THE COMMONWEALTH · PI Anjali M Rajadhyaksha · 2000 to 2026
$34.6M
NIDA NIH HHS 2P30-DA013429NIDA NIH HHS P30 DA013429
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The novel centrally acting analgesic tapentadol [(-)-(1R,2R)-3-(3-dimethylamino-1-ethyl-2-methyl-propyl)-phenol hydrochloride] combines two mechanisms of action, μ-opioid receptor (MOR) agonism and noradrenaline reuptake inhibition (NRI), in a single molecule. Pharmacological antagonism studies have demonstrated that both mechanisms of action contribute to the analgesic effects of tapentadol. This study was designed to investigate the nature of the interaction of the two mechanisms. Dose-response curves were generated in rats for tapentadol alone or in combination with the opioid antagonist naloxone or the α(2)-adrenoceptor antagonist yohimbine. Two different pain models were used: 1) low-intensity tail-flick and 2) spinal nerve ligation. In each model, we obtained dose-effect relations to reveal the effect of tapentadol based on MOR agonism, NRI, and unblocked tapentadol. Receptor fractional occupation was determined from tapentadol's brain concentration and its dissociation constant for each binding site. Tapentadol produced dose-dependent analgesic effects in both pain models, and its dose-effect curves were shifted to the right by both antagonists, thereby providing data to distinguish between MOR agonism and NRI. Both isobolographic analysis of occupation-effect data and a theoretically equivalent methodology determining interactions from the effect scale demonstrated very pronounced synergistic interaction between the two mechanisms of action of tapentadol. This may explain why tapentadol is only 2- to 3-fold less potent than morphine across a variety of preclinical pain models despite its 50-fold lower affinity for the MOR. This is probably the first demonstration of a synergistic interaction between the occupied receptors for a single compound with two mechanisms of action.

Indexed as

AnalgesiaAnimalsDose-Response Relationship, DrugDrug SynergismMalePain MeasurementPhenolsProtein BindingRandom AllocationRatsRats, Sprague-DawleyReceptors, Opioid, muTapentadolPhenolsReceptors, Opioid, muTapentadol

Identifiers

PMID21262850
PMCPMC3364495

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.