Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21261949›Full record

Trial reportBMC health services research2011

The effectiveness of the Liverpool care pathway in improving end of life care for dying cancer patients in hospital. A cluster randomised trial.

Massimo Costantini, Simona Ottonelli, Laura Canavacci, Fabio Pellegrini, Monica Beccaro, LCP Randomised Italian Cluster Trial Study Group

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIIRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC health services research, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01081899 (The Effectiveness of the Liverpool Care Pathway in Improving End of Life Care for Dying Cancer Patients in Hospital. A Cluster Randomised Trial.), which is not on this map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01081899 phase3completednot on this map

The Effectiveness of the Liverpool Care Pathway in Improving End of Life Care for Dying Cancer Patients in Hospital. A Cluster Randomised Trial.

TypeinterventionalSponsorRegional Palliative Care NetworkRan2009 to 2012Enrolled308ConditionsCancerArmsThe LCP-I Program
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Variation in medication use in cancer patients at the end of life: a cross-sectional analysis.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2013
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Massimo CostantiniRegional Palliative Care Network, National Cancer Research Institute, Genoa, Italy. massimo.costantini@istge.it
Simona Ottonelli
Laura Canavacci
Fabio Pellegrini
Monica Beccaro
LCP Randomised Italian Cluster Trial Study Group

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMost cancer patients still die in hospital, mainly in medical wards. Many studies in different countries have shown the poor quality of end-of-life care delivery in hospitals. The Program "Liverpool Care Pathway for the dying patient" (LCP), developed in the UK to transfer the hospice model of care into hospitals and other care settings, is a complex intervention to improve the quality of end-of-life care. The results from qualitative and quantitative studies suggest that the LCP Program can improve significantly the quality of end-of-life care delivery in hospitals, but no randomised trial has been conducted till now. METHODS AND

designThis is a randomized cluster trial, stratified by regions and matched for assessment period. Pairs of eligible medical wards from different hospitals will be randomized to receive the LCP-I Program or no intervention until the end of the trial. The LCP-I Program will be implemented by a Palliative Care Unit.The assessment of the end-points will be performed for all cancer deaths occurred in the six months after the end of the LCP-I implementation in the experimental wards and, in the same period of time, in the matched control wards. The primary end-point is the overall quality of end-of-life care provided on the ward to dying cancer patients and their families, assessed using the Global Scale of the Italian version of the Toolkit "After-death Bereaved Family Member Interview". DISCUSSION: This study can be interpreted as a Phase III trial according to the Medical Research Council Framework. In this study, the effectiveness of a fully defined intervention is assessed by comparing the distribution of the endpoints in the experimental and in the control arm. RESEARCH ID: RFPS-2006-6-341619

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01081899.

Indexed as

Critical PathwaysNeoplasmsCluster AnalysisEnglandHumansPalliative CareProgram EvaluationQuality Assurance, Health CareTerminal Care

Identifiers

PMID21261949
PMCPMC3040703

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.