Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21261931›Full record

ArticleMicrobial biotechnology2009

Nitric oxide-mediated dispersal in single- and multi-species biofilms of clinically and industrially relevant microorganisms.

Nicolas Barraud, Michael V Storey, Zoe P Moore, Jeremy S Webb, Scott A Rice, Staffan Kjelleberg

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Microbial biotechnology, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02277171 (Prospective, Phase I, Single-Center, Evaluation of the Safety and Tolerability of Nitric Oxide Impregnated Urinary Catheters in Patients Undergoing Radical Prostatectomy), which is not on this map. Cited by 112 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
112citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02277171 phase1completednot on this mapstarted 2014, after this paper: background citation

Prospective, Phase I, Single-Center, Evaluation of the Safety and Tolerability of Nitric Oxide Impregnated Urinary Catheters in Patients Undergoing Radical Prostatectomy

TypeinterventionalSponsorEnox Israel LtdRan2014 to 2015Enrolled15ConditionsUrinary Tract Infection, BacteriuriaArmsNitric Oxide impregnated catheter
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

112 citing papers in PubMed, 286 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Frontiers in microbiology · 2025
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Small molecule communication ofMicrobiology and molecular biology reviews : MMBR · 2024
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Bacterial respiratory inhibition triggers dispersal ofApplied and environmental microbiology · 2023
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

52 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Nicolas BarraudSchool of Biotechnology and Biomolecular Sciences and Centre for Marine Bio-Innovation, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia.
Michael V Storey
Zoe P Moore
Jeremy S Webb
Scott A Rice
Staffan Kjelleberg
UNSW Sydney · AUSouthampton Solent University · GB

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/C520655/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Strategies to induce biofilm dispersal are of interest due to their potential to prevent biofilm formation and biofilm-related infections. Nitric oxide (NO), an important messenger molecule in biological systems, was previously identified as a signal for dispersal in biofilms of the model organism Pseudomonas aeruginosa. In the present study, the use of NO as an anti-biofilm agent more broadly was assessed. Various NO donors, at concentrations estimated to generate NO levels in the picomolar and low nanomolar range, were tested on single-species biofilms of relevant microorganisms and on multi-species biofilms from water distribution and treatment systems. Nitric oxide-induced dispersal was observed in all biofilms assessed, and the average reduction of total biofilm surface was 63%. Moreover, biofilms exposed to low doses of NO were more susceptible to antimicrobial treatments than untreated biofilms. For example, the efficacy of conventional chlorine treatments at removing multi-species biofilms from water systems was increased by 20-fold in biofilms treated with NO compared with untreated biofilms. These data suggest that combined treatments with NO may allow for novel and improved strategies to control biofilms and have widespread applications in many environmental, industrial and clinical settings.

Indexed as

BacteriaBacterial Physiological PhenomenaBiofilmsHumansMycosesNitric OxideNitric Oxide DonorsPseudomonas InfectionsYeastsNitric OxideNitric Oxide Donors

Identifiers

PMID21261931
PMCPMC3815757
OpenAlexW2040417898

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.