Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21261461›Full record

ReviewHuman gene therapy2011

Contributions of gene marking to cell and gene therapies.

Cecilia N Barese, Cynthia E Dunbar

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Human gene therapy, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Genetic engineering of human and mouse CD4Molecular therapy. Methods & clinical development · 2021
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Cecilia N BareseHematology Branch, National Heart Lung and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20852, USA.
Cynthia E Dunbar
National Institutes of Health · US

Funding

Optimization of gene transfer safety and efficacy focusing on the NHP modelZIAHL002339 · NHLBI · NATIONAL HEART, LUNG, AND BLOOD INSTITUTE · PI DUNBAR, CYNTHIA E · 2009 to 2025
$26.8M
The rhesus macaque as a preclinical model for induced pluripotent stem cellsZIAHL006062 · NHLBI · NATIONAL HEART, LUNG, AND BLOOD INSTITUTE · PI DUNBAR, CYNTHIA E · 2010 to 2024
$8.2M
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The first human genetic modification studies used replication-incompetent integrating vector vectors to introduce marker genes into T lymphocytes and subsequently into hematopoietic stem cells. Such studies have provided numerous insights into the biology of hematopoiesis and immune reconstitution and contributed to clinical development of gene and cell therapies. Tracking of hematopoietic reconstitution and analysis of the origin of residual malignant disease after hematopoietic transplantation has been possible via gene marking. Introduction of selectable marker genes has enabled preselection of specific T-cell populations for tumor and viral immunotherapy and reduced the threat of graft-versus-host disease, improving the survival of patients after allogeneic marrow transplantation. Marking studies in humans, murine xenografts, and large animals have helped optimize conditions for gene transfer into CD34(+) hematopoietic progenitors, contributing to the achievement of gene transfer efficiencies sufficient for clinical benefit in several serious genetic diseases such as X-linked severe combined immunodeficiency and adrenoleukodystrophy. When adverse events linked to insertional mutagenesis arose in clinical gene therapy trials for inherited immunodeficiencies, additional animal studies using gene-marking vectors have greatly increased our understanding of genotoxicity. The knowledge gained from these studies is being translated into new vector designs and clinical protocols, which we hope will continue to improve the efficiency, effectiveness and safety of these promising therapeutic approaches.

Indexed as

Genetic MarkersHematopoietic Stem Cell TransplantationAnimalsAntigens, CD19Drug Resistance, NeoplasmGenetic TherapyHematopoietic Stem CellsHumansMiceReceptor, Nerve Growth FactorT-LymphocytesAntigens, CD19Genetic MarkersReceptor, Nerve Growth Factor

Identifiers

PMID21261461
PMCPMC3120086
OpenAlexW2046792578

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.