Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21261280›Full record

ArticleAnalytical chemistry2011

Rapid prototyping of arrayed microfluidic systems in polystyrene for cell-based assays.

Edmond W K Young, Erwin Berthier, David J Guckenberger, Eric Sackmann, Casey Lamers, Ivar Meyvantsson, Anna Huttenlocher, David J Beebe

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Analytical chemistry, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 60 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
60citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

60 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Customizable Microfluidic Origami Liver-on-a-Chip (oLOC).Advanced materials technologies · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. The Current Challenges for Drug Discovery in CNS Remyelination.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Microfluidic tools for lipid production and modification: a review.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2019
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Edmond W K YoungDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Wisconsin Institutes for Medical Research, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin 53705, USA.
Erwin Berthier
David J Guckenberger
Eric Sackmann
Casey Lamers
Ivar Meyvantsson
Anna Huttenlocher
David J Beebe

Funding

Microchannel cell-based assays to enable cancer researchR33CA137673 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI BEEBE, DAVID J · 2009 to 2011
$1.4M
A microfluidic chemotaxis device for high content screeningR44HL088785 · NHLBI · BELLBROOK LABS, LLC · PI MEYVANTSSON, IVAR · 2009 to 2010
$963k
NCI NIH HHS CA137673NCI NIH HHS R33 CA137673NHLBI NIH HHS R44 HL088785NHLBI NIH HHS R44-HL088785
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Microfluidic cell-based systems have enabled the study of cellular phenomena with improved spatiotemporal control of the microenvironment and at increased throughput. While poly(dimethylsiloxane) (PDMS) has emerged as the most popular material in microfluidics research, it has specific limitations that prevent microfluidic platforms from achieving their full potential. We present here a complete process, ranging from mold design to embossing and bonding, that describes the fabrication of polystyrene (PS) microfluidic devices with similar cost and time expenditures as PDMS-based devices. Emphasis was placed on creating methods that can compete with PDMS fabrication methods in terms of robustness, complexity, and time requirements. To achieve this goal, several improvements were made to remove critical bottlenecks in existing PS embossing methods. First, traditional lithographic techniques were adapted to fabricate bulk epoxy molds capable of resisting high temperatures and pressures. Second, a method was developed to emboss through-holes in a PS layer, enabling creation of large arrays of independent microfluidic systems on a single device without need to manually create access ports. Third, thermal bonding of PS layers was optimized in order to achieve quality bonding over large arrays of microsystems. The choice of materials and methods was validated for biological function in two different cell-based applications to demonstrate the versatility of our streamlined fabrication process.

Indexed as

DiffusionDimethylpolysiloxanesEndothelial CellsEpoxy CompoundsEquipment DesignHumansMicrofluidic Analytical TechniquesMicrotechnologyPolystyrenesPrintingReproducibility of ResultsSurface PropertiesTemperatureTime FactorsbaysilonDimethylpolysiloxanesEpoxy CompoundsPolystyrenes

Identifiers

PMID21261280
PMCPMC3052265

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.