Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21261207›Full record

Trial reportJournal of health, population, and nutrition2010

Community-based health workers achieve high coverage in neonatal intervention trials: a case study from Sylhet, Bangladesh.

Rasheduzzaman Shah, Melinda K Munos, Peter J Winch, Luke C Mullany, Ishtiaq Mannan, Syed Moshfiqur Rahman, Radwanur Rahman, Daniel Hossain, Shams El Arifeen, Abdullah H Baqui

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of health, population, and nutrition, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Umbilical cord antiseptics for preventing sepsis and death among newborns.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2013
    Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Rasheduzzaman ShahICDDR,B, Mohakhali, Dhaka 1212, Bangladesh.
Melinda K Munos
Peter J Winch
Luke C Mullany
Ishtiaq Mannan
Syed Moshfiqur Rahman
Radwanur Rahman
Daniel Hossain
Shams El Arifeen
Abdullah H Baqui

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A large proportion of four million neonatal deaths occur each year during the first 24 hours of life. Research is particularly needed to determine the efficacy of interventions during the first 24 hours. Large cadres of community-based workers are required in newborn-care research both to deliver these interventions in a standardized manner in the home and to measure the outcomes of the study. In a large-scale community-based efficacy trial of chlorhexidine for cleansing the cord in north-eastern rural Bangladesh, a two-tiered system of community-based workers was established to deliver a package of essential maternal and newborn-care interventions and one of three umbilical cord-care regimens. At any given time, the trial employed approximately 133 community health workers--each responsible for 4-5 village health workers and a population of approximately 4,000. Over the entire trial period, 29,760 neonates were enrolled, and 87% of them received the intervention (their assigned cord-care regimen) within 24 hours of birth. Approaches to recruitment, training, and supervision in the study are described. Key lessons included the importance of supportive processes for community-based workers, including a strong training and field supervisory system, community acceptance of the study, consideration of the setting, study objectives, and human resources available.

Indexed as

Community Health WorkersUmbilical CordAnti-Infective Agents, LocalBangladeshChlorhexidineFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornInfant, Newborn, DiseasesMaleMothersRural HealthSkin CareAnti-Infective Agents, LocalChlorhexidine

Identifiers

PMID21261207
PMCPMC2995030

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.