ArticleThe Mount Sinai journal of medicine, New York
National Children's Study: update in 2010.
Article in The Mount Sinai journal of medicine, New York. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed.
- Feasibility and acceptability of alternate methods of postnatal data collection.Maternal and child health journal · 2014Trial
- Understanding prenatal household exposures to per- and polyfluorylalkyl substances using paired Biological and dust measurements with sociodemographic and housing variables.Environment international · 2024Article
- Assessing lead exposure in U.S. pregnant women using biological and residential measurements.The Science of the total environment · 2023Article
- Geographic and demographic variability in serum PFAS concentrations for pregnant women in the United States.Journal of exposure science & environmental epidemiology · 2023Article
- Approach to High Volume Enrollment in Clinical Research: Experiences from an All of Us Research Program Site.Clinical and translational science · 2020Article
- Screening for Pregnancy Status in a Population-Based Sample: Characteristics Associated with Item Nonresponse.Maternal and child health journal · 2019Article
- Article
- Introduction and Goals for the National Children's Study.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2017Review
- The National Children's Study: Recruitment Outcomes Using the Provider-Based Recruitment Approach.Pediatrics · 2016Article
- Article
- Lessons from Prenatal Care Provider-Based Recruitment into the National Children's Study.Pediatric reports · 2015Article
- Recruitment of women in the National Children's Study Initial Vanguard Study.American journal of epidemiology · 2014Article
- Pregnancy recruitment for population research: the National Children's Study vanguard experience in Wayne County, Michigan.Paediatric and perinatal epidemiology · 2013Article
- Effect of Small Monetary Incentive and Demographic Characteristics on Response Rate of Self-Administered Questionnaire Mailed to Rural Women.Online journal of rural research and policy · 2013Article
- The National Children's Study: an opportunity for medical toxicology.Journal of medical toxicology : official journal of the American College of Medical Toxicology · 2012Review
- European birth cohorts for environmental health research.Environmental health perspectives · 2012Review
- The National Children's Study in North Carolina: a study of the effect of the environment on children's health, growth, and development.North Carolina medical journalArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The National Children's Study will examine the effects of the environment and genetics on the growth, development, and health of children across the United States; it will follow participants from before birth until age 21 years. The goal of the study is to improve the health and well-being of children and contribute to understanding the roles various factors play in health and disease. Findings from the study will be made available as the research progresses, making potential benefits known to the public as soon as possible. A robust pilot study, or Vanguard Study, is underway to generate data for designing the subsequent Main Study. The goals of the Vanguard Study are feasibility, acceptability, and cost, and the goals of the Main Study will be exposure-response relationships and biological, environmental, and genetic interactions. The initial Vanguard Study experience among 7 study centers was successful in many ways, including delineating the topics to explore for the next phase of the Vanguard Study. Three different recruitment strategies are under evaluation to determine what approach to use for the Main Study. The organization of National Children's Study operations is currently based on a new decentralized business model.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.