Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21259124›Full record

ReviewCerebellum (London, England)2011

Mini-review: synaptic integration in the cerebellar nuclei--perspectives from dynamic clamp and computer simulation studies.

Dieter Jaeger

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Cerebellum (London, England), 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Biophysical KeLife · 2022
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. A cerebellar learning model of vestibulo-ocular reflex adaptation in wild-type and mutant mice.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2014
    Article
  11. Article
  12. The cerebellar nuclei take center stage.Cerebellum (London, England) · 2011
    Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Dieter JaegerDepartment of Biology, Emory University, 1510 Clifton Road NE, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA. djaeger@emory.edu

Funding

Synaptic integration in the deep cerebellar nucleiR01MH065634 · NIMH · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI JAEGER, DIETER · 2003 to 2007
$1.1M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH065634
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The cerebellar nuclei (CN) process inhibition from Purkinje cells (PC) and excitation from mossy and climbing fiber collaterals. CN neurons in slices show intrinsic pacemaking activity, which is easily modulated by synaptic inputs. Our work using dynamic clamping and computer modeling shows that synchronicity between PC inputs is an important factor in determining spike rate and spike timing of CN neurons and that brief pauses in PC inputs provide a potent stimulus to trigger CN spikes. Excitatory input can equally control spike rate, but, due to a large slow, NMDA component also amplifies responses to inhibitory inputs. Intrinsic properties of CN neurons are well suited to provide prolonged responses to strong input transients and could be involved in motor pattern generation. One such specific mechanism is given by fast and slow rebound bursting. Nevertheless, we are just beginning to unravel synaptic integration in the CN, and the outcome of the work to date is best characterized by the generation of new specific questions that lend themselves to a combined experimental and computer modeling approach in future studies.

Indexed as

Computer SimulationPatch-Clamp TechniquesAction PotentialsAnimalsCerebellar NucleiHumansMolecular Dynamics SimulationSynapsesSynaptic Transmission

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.