Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21258831›Full record

ReviewJournal of molecular modeling2011

RNA and protein 3D structure modeling: similarities and differences.

Kristian Rother, Magdalena Rother, Michał Boniecki, Tomasz Puton, Janusz M Bujnicki

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of molecular modeling, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. 3dRNA: Building RNA 3D structure with improved template library.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2020
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Using Rosetta for RNA homology modeling.Methods in enzymology · 2019
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Native Mass Spectrometry: What is in the Name?Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry · 2017
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Kristian RotherLaboratory of Bioinformatics and Protein Engineering, International Institute of Molecular and Cell Biology, ul. Ks. Trojdena 4, 02-109, Warsaw, Poland.
Magdalena Rother
Michał Boniecki
Tomasz Puton
Janusz M Bujnicki

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In analogy to proteins, the function of RNA depends on its structure and dynamics, which are encoded in the linear sequence. While there are numerous methods for computational prediction of protein 3D structure from sequence, there have been very few such methods for RNA. This review discusses template-based and template-free approaches for macromolecular structure prediction, with special emphasis on comparison between the already tried-and-tested methods for protein structure modeling and the very recently developed "protein-like" modeling methods for RNA. We highlight analogies between many successful methods for modeling of these two types of biological macromolecules and argue that RNA 3D structure can be modeled using "protein-like" methodology. We also highlight the areas where the differences between RNA and proteins require the development of RNA-specific solutions.

Indexed as

Computer SimulationModels, MolecularEvolution, MolecularKnowledge BasesNucleic Acid ConformationProtein ConformationProtein FoldingProteinsRNAThermodynamicsProteinsRNA

Identifiers

PMID21258831
PMCPMC3168752

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.