Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21258774›Full record

SynthesisDer Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen2011

[Long-term results in total knee arthroplasty. A meta-analysis of revision rates and functional outcome].

J Lützner, U Hübel, S Kirschner, K-P Günther, F Krummenauer

Abstract readEnglish AbstractMeta-Analysis
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 77 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. The effect of age on the outcomes of cementless mobile bearing unicompartmental knee replacements.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Knee joint laxity is restored in a bi-cruciate retaining TKA-design.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2020
    Article
  17. Characterizing patients' expectations in hip and knee osteoarthritis.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2020
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Ten-year clinical and radiographic results of 1000 cementless Oxford unicompartmental knee replacements.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2020
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

J LütznerOrthopädische Klinik, Universitätsklinikum Carl Gustav Carus Dresden, Fetscherstrasse 74, Dresden, Germany. Joerg.Luetzner@uniklinikum-dresden.de
U Hübel
S Kirschner
K-P Günther
F Krummenauer
Klinik und Poliklinik für Psychotherapie und Psychosomatik · DEUniversity Hospital Carl Gustav Carus · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTotal knee arthroplasty (TKA) is one of the most common procedures in orthopedic surgery and clinical success can be characterized by the revision rate and improvement of function. To quantify both characteristics two independent meta-analyses have been performed. MATERIALS AND

methodsA search in Medline provided a total of 96 studies on revision rates and 63 studies with functional results with a minimum follow-up of 5 years.

resultsA total of 911 revisions among 20,873 TKAs were identified corresponding to a meta-revision rate of 4.4% after a mean follow-up of 10.7 years. Most common causes for revision were aseptic loosening (31%), infection (23%), polyethylene wear (16%) and patellar problems (14%). Revision rates were higher in younger patients (7.0% <60 years at time of operation, 5.0% between 60 to 70 years and 2.2% >70 years), after cementless TKA (8.3% cementless versus 3.6% cemented) and in studies with a higher rate of patients with rheumatoid arthritis. The second meta-analysis revealed a meta-improvement based on the Knee Society Knee Score of 51.3%, for the Knee Society Function Score of 30.6%, for the Hospital for Special Surgery Score of 36.1% and for the New Jersey Orthopedic Hospital Knee Evaluation System of 33.6%.

conclusionTKA is a successful treatment for osteoarthritis of the knee with an expectable revision rate of less than 5% within 10 years and a long-lasting functional improvement of more than 30% in any assessment score.

Indexed as

Arthroplasty, Replacement, KneeProsthesis FailureAgedAge FactorsFollow-Up StudiesHumansKnee ProsthesisMiddle AgedOsteoarthritis, KneePostoperative ComplicationsProsthesis DesignProsthesis-Related InfectionsReoperation

Identifiers

PMID21258774
OpenAlexW1515583094

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.