Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21257806›Full record

ArticleApplied and environmental microbiology2011

Prevalence and characterization of non-O157 shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli isolates from commercial ground beef in the United States.

Joseph M Bosilevac, Mohammad Koohmaraie

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Applied and environmental microbiology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 63 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
63citing papers in PubMed
15.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

63 citing papers in PubMed, 219 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. The Ability of Shiga Toxin-ProducingFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Presence and Virulence Characteristics of Shiga ToxinFoodborne pathogens and disease · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Diversity of Non-O157 Shiga Toxin-ProducingAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2021
    Article
  9. Article
  10. First Isolation and Molecular Characterization ofFrontiers in veterinary science · 2021
    Article
  11. Improved Genomic Identification, Clustering, and Serotyping of Shiga Toxin-ProducingFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2021
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Comparative Transcriptomics of Shiga Toxin-Producing and CommensalFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2020
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Presence of Shiga Toxin-ProducingMicroorganisms · 2018
    Article
  19. Variability in CharacterizingMicroorganisms · 2018
    Article
  20. Review

3 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Joseph M BosilevacUSDA, ARS, U.S. Meat Animal Research Center, P.O. Box 166, State Spur 18D, Clay Center, NE 68933-0166, USA. Mick.Bosilevac@ars.usda.gov
Mohammad Koohmaraie
King Saud University · SARoman L. Hruska U.S. Meat Animal Research Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Escherichia coli O157:H7 is a Shiga toxin (stx)-producing E. coli (STEC) strain that has been classified as an adulterant in U.S. beef. However, numerous other non-O157 STEC strains are associated with diseases of various severities and have become an increasing concern to the beef industry, regulatory officials, and the public. This study reports on the prevalence and characterization of non-O157 STEC in commercial ground beef samples (n = 4,133) obtained from numerous manufacturers across the United States over a period of 24 months. All samples were screened by DNA amplification for the presence of Shiga toxin genes, which were present in 1,006 (24.3%) of the samples. Then, culture isolation of an STEC isolate from all samples that contained stx(1) and/or stx(2) was attempted. Of the 1,006 positive ground beef samples screened for stx, 300 (7.3% of the total of 4,133) were confirmed to have at least one strain of STEC present by culture isolation. In total, 338 unique STEC isolates were recovered from the 300 samples that yielded an STEC isolate. All unique STEC isolates were serotyped and were characterized for the presence of known virulence factors. These included Shiga toxin subtypes, intimin subtypes, and accessory virulence factors related to adherence (saa, iha, lifA), toxicity (cnf, subA, astA), iron acquisition (chuA), and the presence of the large 60-MDa virulence plasmid (espP, etpD, toxB, katP, toxB). The isolates were also characterized by use of a pathogenicity molecular risk assessment (MRA; based on the presence of various O-island nle genes). Results of this characterization identified 10 STEC isolates (0.24% of the 4,133 total) that may be considered a significant food safety threat, defined by the presence of eae, subA, and nle genes.

Indexed as

AnimalsCattleEscherichia coli ProteinsFood MicrobiologyMeatShiga-Toxigenic Escherichia coliUnited StatesEscherichia coli Proteins

Identifiers

PMID21257806
PMCPMC3067332
OpenAlexW2136351951

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.