Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21257146›Full record

Trial reportAmerican journal of ophthalmology2011

A randomized trial of brimonidine versus timolol in preserving visual function: results from the Low-Pressure Glaucoma Treatment Study.

Theodore Krupin, Jeffrey M Liebmann, David S Greenfield, Robert Ritch, Stuart Gardiner, Low-Pressure Glaucoma Study Group

Erratum issuedAbstract readComparative StudyMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in American journal of ophthalmology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 159 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
159citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
22.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

159 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 386 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Neuroprotection for treatment of glaucoma in adults.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2017
    Pooled it
  3. Neuroprotection for treatment of glaucoma in adults.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2013
    Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Observational
  19. Article
  20. Review

99 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Theodore KrupinDepartment of Ophthalmology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University and the Chicago Center for Vision Research, Chicago, Illinois 60611, USA. krupin@northwestern.edu
Jeffrey M Liebmann
David S Greenfield
Robert Ritch
Stuart Gardiner
Low-Pressure Glaucoma Study Group
Legacy Health · USManhattan Eye, Ear and Throat Hospital · USNew York Medical College · USNorthwestern University · USUniversity of Miami · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo compare the alpha2-adrenergic agonist brimonidine tartrate 0.2% to the beta-adrenergic antagonist timolol maleate 0.5% in preserving visual function in low-pressure glaucoma.

designRandomized, double-masked, multicenter clinical trial.

methodsExclusion criteria included untreated intraocular pressure (IOP) >21 mm Hg, visual field mean deviation worse than -16 decibels, or contraindications to study medications. Both eyes received twice-daily monotherapy randomized in blocks of 7 (4 brimonidine to 3 timolol). Standard automated perimetry and tonometry were performed at 4-month intervals. Main outcome measure was field progression in either eye, defined as the same 3 or more points with a negative slope ≥-1 dB/year at P<5%, on 3 consecutive tests, assessed by pointwise linear regression. Secondary outcome measures were progression based on glaucoma change probability maps (GCPM) of pattern deviation and the 3-omitting method for pointwise linear regression.

resultsNinety-nine patients were randomized to brimonidine and 79 to timolol. Mean (± SE) months of follow-up for all patients was 30.0 ± 2. Statistically fewer brimonidine-treated patients (9, 9.1%) had visual field progression by pointwise linear regression than timolol-treated patients (31, 39.2%, log-rank 12.4, P=.001). Mean treated IOP was similar for brimonidine- and timolol-treated patients at all time points. More brimonidine-treated (28, 28.3%) than timolol-treated (9, 11.4%) patients discontinued study participation because of drug-related adverse events (P=.008). Similar differences in progression were observed when analyzed by GCPM and the 3-omitting method.

conclusionLow-pressure glaucoma patients treated with brimonidine 0.2% who do not develop ocular allergy are less likely to have field progression than patients treated with timolol 0.5%.

Indexed as

Administration, TopicalAdrenergic alpha-2 Receptor AgonistsAdrenergic beta-AntagonistsAgedBrimonidine TartrateDouble-Blind MethodFemaleFollow-Up StudiesGonioscopyHumansIntraocular PressureLow Tension GlaucomaMaleMiddle AgedOphthalmic SolutionsQuinoxalinesAdrenergic alpha-2 Receptor AgonistsAdrenergic beta-AntagonistsBrimonidine TartrateOphthalmic SolutionsQuinoxalinesTimolol

Identifiers

PMID21257146
OpenAlexW2070086483

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.