Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21256193›Full record

ArticleNeuroscience2011

N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor subunit composition in the rat trigeminal principal nucleus remains constant during postnatal development and following neonatal denervation.

F-S Lo, S Zhao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuroscience, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 36% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. How the Barrel Cortex Became a Working Model for Developmental Plasticity: A Historical Perspective.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2020
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Development and critical period plasticity of the barrel cortex.The European journal of neuroscience · 2012
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

F-S LoDepartment of Anatomy and Neurobiology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, 20 Penn Street, Baltimore, MD 21201, USA. Fusunlo@gmail.com
S Zhao
University of Maryland, Baltimore · US

Funding

CELLULAR MECHANISMS UNDERLYING PATTERN FORMATIONR01NS037070 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE · PI ERZURUMLU, REHA S · 1998 to 2013
$3.4M
NINDS NIH HHS NS037070NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS037070
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors (NMDARs) play a major role in various forms of developmental and adult synaptic plasticity (Lopez de Armentia M, Sah P (2003) J Neurosci 23:6876-6883). Activity-dependent shifts in NR2 subunits of the NMDARs have been proposed to be the molecular basis of critical period plasticity. Several supporting examples have been reported; however it is not clear whether the relationship between NMDAR subunit changes and neural plasticity are correlative or causal, nor whether such a relationship is universal across all sensory pathways with developmental plasticity. In the present study, we used voltage-clamp recording techniques to investigate whether subunit composition of NMDARs changes during development and after neonatal denervation in the principal sensory nucleus (PrV) of the trigeminal nerve. Relative AMPA receptor contribution to synaptic transmission increased linearly by the second postnatal week in the normal PrV. Denervation by peripheral nerve damage did not alter this process. We took the weighted decay time constant (τw) of NMDAR-mediated EPSCs as an index for NMDAR subunit composition. The τw measurement and Western blot analysis revealed that NMDARs contained both NR2A and NR2B subunits. The NR2A/NR2B ratio did not change during postnatal development or after neonatal denervation. Thus, critical period plasticity-related pattern formation in the PrV does not depend on changes in subunit composition of NMDARs. The mechanism underlying developmental synaptic plasticity in the PrV differs from those in higher trigeminal centers and other brain structures.

Indexed as

AnimalsAnimals, NewbornDenervationExcitatory Postsynaptic PotentialsNeuronal PlasticityNeuronsPatch-Clamp TechniquesPeripheral NervesRatsRats, Sprague-DawleyReceptors, AMPAReceptors, N-Methyl-D-AspartateSynaptic TransmissionTrigeminal NucleiNR2A NMDA receptorNR2B NMDA receptorReceptors, AMPAReceptors, N-Methyl-D-Aspartate

Identifiers

PMID21256193
PMCPMC3056357
OpenAlexW2089066831

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.