SynthesisClinical psychology review2011
A comparative study of violence risk assessment tools: a systematic review and metaregression analysis of 68 studies involving 25,980 participants.
Synthesis in Clinical psychology review, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 67 papers, 10 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
67 citing papers in PubMed, 10 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 650 citations in OpenAlex.
- Tools to predict imminent risk of patient perpetrated workplace violence in healthcare settings: an umbrella review.BMC public health · 2025Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Violence risk assessment instruments in forensic psychiatric populations: a systematic review and meta-analysis.The lancet. Psychiatry · 2023Pooled it
- The role of religiosity and spirituality in interpersonal violence: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Revista brasileira de psiquiatria (Sao Paulo, Brazil : 1999) · 2023Pooled it
- Pooled it
- The impact of machine learning in predicting risk of violence: A systematic review.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2022Pooled it
- Use of risk assessment instruments to predict violence in forensic psychiatric hospitals: a systematic review and meta-analysis.European psychiatry : the journal of the Association of European Psychiatrists · 2018Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Use of risk assessment instruments to predict violence and antisocial behaviour in 73 samples involving 24 827 people: systematic review and meta-analysis.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2012Pooled it
- Structured assessment of violence risk in schizophrenia and other psychiatric disorders: a systematic review of the validity, reliability, and item content of 10 available instruments.Schizophrenia bulletin · 2011Pooled it
- Emotional Processing in Incarcerated Men and Women: Associations with Psychopathic Traits.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Improving risk assessment in forensic mental health: Temporal validation and clinical refinement of the FoVOx risk tool.European psychiatry : the journal of the Association of European Psychiatrists · 2026Article
- Computational Analysis of Expressive Behavior in Clinical Assessment.Annual review of clinical psychology · 2026Review
- The Use of Structured Professional Judgement: A New Way to Understand and Assess Bite Risk from Dogs.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026Article
- Using a short-term risk assessment and compassion focused staff support groups to reduce restrictive intervention use in a secure mental health service.The British journal of clinical psychology · 2026Article
- Application of the Plan-Do-Check-Act Management Model to Violence Risk Management in a Psychiatric Ward: Impact on Patient Safety and Nurse-Patient Relationships.Neuropsychiatric disease and treatment · 2026Article
- Reliability and Validity of Risk Assessment Tools for Violent Extremism: A Systematic Review.Campbell systematic reviews · 2025Review
- A review of progress in violence risk assessment methods.Forensic sciences research · 2025Review
- Predictive Validity of the Brøset Violence Checklist in a Secured Institution for Offenders With Intellectual Disabilities.Journal of intellectual disability research : JIDR · 2025Observational
- Predictive accuracy of the Violence Risk Assessment Checklist for Youth in acute institutions: A prospective naturalistic multicenter study.European psychiatry : the journal of the Association of European Psychiatrists · 2025Observational
7 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
There are a large number of structured instruments that assist in the assessment of antisocial, violent and sexual risk, and their use appears to be increasing in mental health and criminal justice settings. However, little is known about which commonly used instruments produce the highest rates of predictive validity, and whether overall rates of predictive validity differ by gender, ethnicity, outcome, and other study characteristics. We undertook a systematic review and meta-analysis of nine commonly used risk assessment instruments following PRISMA guidelines. We collected data from 68 studies based on 25,980 participants in 88 independent samples. For 54 of the samples, new tabular data was provided directly by authors. We used four outcome statistics to assess rates of predictive validity, and analyzed sources of heterogeneity using subgroup analysis and metaregression. A tool designed to detect violence risk in juveniles, the Structured Assessment of Violence Risk in Youth (SAVRY), produced the highest rates of predictive validity, while an instrument used to identify adults at risk for general offending, the Level of Service Inventory-Revised (LSI-R), and a personality scale commonly used for the purposes of risk assessment, the Psychopathy Checklist-Revised (PCL-R), produced the lowest. Instruments produced higher rates of predictive validity in older and in predominantly White samples. Risk assessment procedures and guidelines by mental health services and criminal justice systems may need review in light of these findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.