ArticleMicrobial biotechnology2010
Genome (re-)annotation and open-source annotation pipelines.
Article in Microbial biotechnology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Multi-Omics Perspective onInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Novel Enzymes From the Red Sea Brine Pools: Current State and Potential.Frontiers in microbiology · 2021Review
- Article
- Review on the Computational Genome Annotation of Sequences Obtained by Next-Generation Sequencing.Biology · 2020Review
- MIC_Locator: a novel image-based protein subcellular location multi-label prediction model based on multi-scale monogenic signal representation and intensity encoding strategy.BMC bioinformatics · 2019Article
- No wisdom in the crowd: genome annotation in the era of big data - current status and future prospects.Microbial biotechnology · 2018Review
- Genome Sequences of 12 Mycobacteriophages Recovered from Archival Stocks in Japan.Genome announcements · 2018Article
- Relating Phage Genomes toInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2018Review
- Genomic and transcriptomic landscape of Escherichia coli BL21(DE3).Nucleic acids research · 2017Article
- Functional Annotations of Paralogs: A Blessing and a Curse.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2016Article
- Explaining microbial phenotypes on a genomic scale: GWAS for microbes.Briefings in functional genomics · 2013Review
- Genome sequencing of bacteria: sequencing, de novo assembly and rapid analysis using open source tools.BMC genomics · 2013Article
- Reduce manual curation by combining gene predictions from multiple annotation engines, a case study of start codon prediction.PloS one · 2013Article
- Improving pan-genome annotation using whole genome multiple alignment.BMC bioinformatics · 2011Article
- Searching in microbial genomes for encoded small proteins.Microbial biotechnology · 2011Article
- OryzaPG-DB: rice proteome database based on shotgun proteogenomics.BMC plant biology · 2011Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.