ArticleMicrobial biotechnology2010
Probiotics genomics.
Article in Microbial biotechnology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Endospore production ofEngineering in life sciences · 2023Review
- Effect ofNutrients · 2022Article
- One Health Probiotics as Biocontrol Agents: One Health Tomato Probiotics.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Application ofAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2020Review
- Growth Mode and Carbon Source Impact the Surfaceome Dynamics ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2019Article
- Structural Characterization of theMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2018Article
- Potential Use ofFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2018Review
- Immobilized lipase fromJournal, genetic engineering & biotechnology · 2017Article
- Comparative genomics of Lactobacillus crispatus suggests novel mechanisms for the competitive exclusion of Gardnerella vaginalis.BMC genomics · 2014Article
- Microbial characterization of probiotics--advisory report of the Working Group "8651 Probiotics" of the Belgian Superior Health Council (SHC).Molecular nutrition & food research · 2013Article
- Genomic diversity and versatility of Lactobacillus plantarum, a natural metabolic engineer.Microbial cell factories · 2011Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.