Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21255158›Full record

ArticleClinical and experimental allergy : journal of the British Society for Allergy and Clinical Immunology2011

Bone marrow stromal cells inhibit mast cell function via a COX2-dependent mechanism.

J M Brown, K Nemeth, N M Kushnir-Sukhov, D D Metcalfe, E Mezey

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical and experimental allergy : journal of the British Society for Allergy and Clinical Immunology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 64 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
64citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

64 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 125 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Bone: A Neglected Endocrine Organ?Journal of clinical medicine · 2024
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

4 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

J M BrownLaboratory of Allergic Diseases, NIAID, NIH, Bethesda, MD, USA CSDB, NIDCR, NIH, Bethesda, MD, USA. brownja@ecu.edu
K Nemeth
N M Kushnir-Sukhov
D D Metcalfe
E Mezey
National Institutes of Health · USNational Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research · US

Funding

Contribution of bone marrow cells to tissue regeneration, immune function and hematopoiesisZIADE000714 · NIDCR · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF DENTAL & CRANIOFACIAL RESEARCH · PI MEZEY, EVA M. · 2009 to 2025
$25.3M
The Pathogenesis, Diagnosis, And Treatment Of Systemic Mast Cell DisordersZIAAI000249 · NIAID · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ALLERGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASES · PI KOMAROW, HIRSH D · 2009 to 2025
$16.5M
Molecular Biology Of Mast Cell Growth And DifferentiationZIAAI000513 · NIAID · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ALLERGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASES · PI METCALFE, DEAN D · 2009 to 2012
$1.3M
Intramural NIH HHS Z99 AI999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMast cells (MCs) have a central role in the induction of allergic inflammation, such as seen in asthma, and contribute to the severity of certain autoimmune diseases, such as rheumatoid arthritis. The MC thus represents an important inflammatory cell, and one which has resisted therapeutic attempts to alter its role in disease.

objectiveBecause bone marrow-derived stromal cells (BMSC, also known as mesenchymal stem cells or MSCs) have been reported to alter allergic inflammation in vivo, we chose to study the interaction between mouse BMSC and mouse bone marrow-derived MCs.

methodsMC degranulation, cytokine production and chemotaxis were evaluated in vitro following co-culture with BMSCs either in cell contact or a transwell. In addition, MC degranulation was assessed in vivo following administration of BMSCs in a model of passive cutaneous anaphylaxis and a peritoneal degranulation assay. Mechanisms of MC suppression by BMSCs were determined through use of inhibitors or antibodies to COX1, COX2, nitric oxide, indoleamine 2, 3-dioxygenase, EP1-4 receptors, TGF-β and IL-10. Lastly, we utilized either BMSCs or MCs deficient in COX1, COX2 or EP1-4 receptors to confirm the mechanisms of inhibition of MC function by BMSCs.

resultsWe discovered that BMSCs will effectively suppress specific MC functions in vitro as well as in vivo. When MCs are cocultured with BMSCs to allow cell-to-cell contact, BMSCs suppressed MC degranulation, pro-inflammatory cytokine production, chemokinesis and chemotaxis. Similarly, MC degranulation within mouse skin or the peritoneal cavity was suppressed following in vivo administration of BMSCs. Further, we found that these inhibitory effects were dependent on up-regulation of COX2 in BMSCs; and were facilitated through the activation of EP4 receptors on MCs. CONCLUSION AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: These observations support the concept that BMSCs have the ability to suppress MC activation and therefore could be the basis for a novel cell based therapeutic approach in the treatment of MC driven inflammatory diseases.

Indexed as

AnimalsBone Marrow CellsCell CommunicationCell DegranulationChemotaxis, LeukocyteCoculture TechniquesCyclooxygenase 2CytokinesMast CellsMesenchymal Stem CellsMiceMice, Inbred C57BLMice, KnockoutPolymerase Chain ReactionStromal CellsCyclooxygenase 2CytokinesPtgs2 protein, mouse

Identifiers

PMID21255158
PMCPMC3078050
OpenAlexW1950053876

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.