ArticleFolia microbiologica2010
Multiplex PCR assay for detection of Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae, Pasteurella multocida and Haemophilus parasuis in lungs of pigs from a slaughterhouse.
Article in Folia microbiologica, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Development and Application of Fluorescent and Lateral Flow Dipstick Recombinase-Aided Amplification for Rapid Detection ofVeterinary sciences · 2025Article
- Establishment and validation of a simple and accurate qPCR detection method for Haemophilus parasuis.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- A CRISPR/Cas12a-assisted rapid detection platform by biosensing theFrontiers in microbiology · 2022Article
- Prevalence and antimicrobial susceptibilities of bacterial pathogens in Chinese pig farms from 2013 to 2017.Scientific reports · 2019Article
- Survey of porcine respiratory disease complex-associated pathogens among commercial pig farms in Korea via oral fluid method.Journal of veterinary science · 2017Article
- Unusual severe cases of type 1 porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSV) infection in conventionally reared pigs in South Korea.BMC veterinary research · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Multiplex PCR has been developed for parallel identification of Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae, Pasteurella multocida and Haemophilus parasuis, important pathogens of swine, responsible for considerable economic losses in swine industry. Multiplex PCR and bacteriological cultivation was used to analyze lung samples from slaughterhouse pigs. From a total of 219 lung samples, 164 (74.9 %) were positive for P. multocida, 45 (20.5 %) for A. pleuropneumoniae and 4 (1.83 %) for H. parasuis. Bacteriological examination revealed that 145 samples (66.2 %) were positive for P. multocida, 31 (14.2 %) for A. pleuropneumoniae and 2 (0.91 %) for H. parasuis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.