Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21253743›Full record

ArticleDer Ophthalmologe : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft2011

[Monitoring treatment with biologics in non-infectious uveitis].

T Barisani-Asenbauer

Abstract readEnglish Abstract
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Der Ophthalmologe : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 39% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

T Barisani-AsenbauerLaura Bassi Centre for Ocular Inflammation & Infection Center for Pathophysiology, Immunology & Infectiology, Medical University of Vienna, Kinderspitalgasse 15, 1090 Wien, Österreich. Talin.barisani@meduniwien.ac.at
Medical University of Vienna · AT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biologics are increasingly being used in the treatment of non-infectious sight-threatening uveitis. While the advantages of biologics, such as avoidance of glucocorticoid side-effects or rapid control of intraocular inflammation therapy refractive to corticosteroids, cannot be dismissed the treating ophthalmologist should be aware of the specific risks. Biologics increase the risk for severe and atypical infections, lymphomas and other malignancies. Treatment should only be initiated when profound knowledge about indications, management and monitoring of treatment with biologics is readily available. Weighing up the risks versus the benefits should be made on an individual basis and guide patient consultation.

Indexed as

Biological ProductsDrug MonitoringEye InfectionsHumansTreatment OutcomeUveitisBiological Products

Identifiers

PMID21253743
OpenAlexW1505426928

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.