Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21253579›Full record

ArticlePloS one2011

Dissecting the within-Africa ancestry of populations of African descent in the Americas.

Klara Stefflova, Matthew C Dulik, Jill S Barnholtz-Sloan, Athma A Pai, Amy H Walker, Timothy R Rebbeck

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Klara StefflovaDepartment of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States of America. Klara.Stefflova@cancer.org.uk
Matthew C Dulik
Jill S Barnholtz-Sloan
Athma A Pai
Amy H Walker
Timothy R Rebbeck

Funding

Segregation and Racial Disparities in Prostate CancerP50CA105641 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI REBBECK, TIMOTHY R · 2003 to 2009
$9.6M
MOLECULAR EPIDEMIOLOGY OF PROSTATE CANCERR01CA085074 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI REBBECK, TIMOTHY R · 1999 to 2010
$2.9M
MOLECULAR EPIDEMIOLOGY OF PROSTATE CANCERR29ES008031 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI REBBECK, TIMOTHY R · 1995 to 1999
–
NCI NIH HHS P50 CA105641NCI NIH HHS P50-CA105641NCI NIH HHS R01 CA085074NCI NIH HHS R01-CA85074NIEHS NIH HHS R29-ES08031
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe ancestry of African-descended Americans is known to be drawn from three distinct populations: African, European, and Native American. While many studies consider this continental admixture, few account for the genetically distinct sources of ancestry within Africa--the continent with the highest genetic variation. Here, we dissect the within-Africa genetic ancestry of various populations of the Americas self-identified as having primarily African ancestry using uniparentally inherited mitochondrial DNA. METHODS AND PRINCIPAL

findingsWe first confirmed that our results obtained using uniparentally-derived group admixture estimates are correlated with the average autosomal-derived individual admixture estimates (hence are relevant to genomic ancestry) by assessing continental admixture using both types of markers (mtDNA and Y-chromosome vs. ancestry informative markers). We then focused on the within-Africa maternal ancestry, mining our comprehensive database of published mtDNA variation (∼5800 individuals from 143 African populations) that helped us thoroughly dissect the African mtDNA pool. Using this well-defined African mtDNA variation, we quantified the relative contributions of maternal genetic ancestry from multiple W/WC/SW/SE (West to South East) African populations to the different pools of today's African-descended Americans of North and South America and the Caribbean.

conclusionsOur analysis revealed that both continental admixture and within-Africa admixture may be critical to achieving an adequate understanding of the ancestry of African-descended Americans. While continental ancestry reflects gender-specific admixture processes influenced by different socio-historical practices in the Americas, the within-Africa maternal ancestry reflects the diverse colonial histories of the slave trade. We have confirmed that there is a genetic thread connecting Africa and the Americas, where each colonial system supplied their colonies in the Americas with slaves from African colonies they controlled or that were available for them at the time. This historical connection is reflected in different relative contributions from populations of W/WC/SW/SE Africa to geographically distinct Africa-derived populations of the Americas, adding to the complexity of genomic ancestry in groups ostensibly united by the same demographic label.

Indexed as

Black or African AmericanBlack PeopleData MiningDNA, MitochondrialHumansDNA, Mitochondrial

Identifiers

PMID21253579
PMCPMC3017210

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.