Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21253529›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of nephrology2010

The cardiorenal syndrome: a review.

B N Shah, K Greaves

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of nephrology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. 48-year-old with Altered Mental Status and Respiratory Failure: A Case Report.Clinical practice and cases in emergency medicine · 2021
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Renal impairment and worsening of renal function in acute heart failure: can new therapies help? The potential role of serelaxin.Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2015
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Advances in the pathogenesis of cardiorenal syndrome type 3.Oxidative medicine and cellular longevity · 2015
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Cardiorenal syndrome: Resistant to diuretics, sensitive to ultraflitration.Journal of cardiovascular disease research · 2012
    Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

B N ShahDepartment of Cardiology, Wessex Cardiothoracic Centre, Southampton University Hospital, Southampton, UK.
K Greaves

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cardiorenal syndrome (CRS) is the umbrella term used to describe clinical conditions in which cardiac and renal dysfunctions coexist. Much has been written on this subject, but underlying pathophysiological mechanisms continue to be unravelled and implications for management continue to be debated. A classification system-incorporating five subtypes-has recently been proposed though it has yet to permeate into day-to-day clinical practice. CRS has garnered much attention from both the cardiological and nephrological communities since the condition is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Renal dysfunction is highly prevalent amongst patients with heart failure and has been shown to be as powerful and independent a marker of adverse prognosis as ejection fraction. Similarly, patients with renal failure are considerably more likely to suffer cardiovascular disease than matched subjects from the general population. This paper begins by reviewing the epidemiology and classification of CRS before going on to consider the different pathological mechanisms underlying cardiorenal dysfunction. We then focus on management strategies and conclude by discussing future directions in the diagnosis and management of patients suffering with CRS.

Identifiers

PMID21253529
PMCPMC3021842

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.