Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21253398›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of gastroenterology2011

Liver function alterations after laparoscopy-assisted gastrectomy for gastric cancer and its clinical significance.

Gui-Ae Jeong, Gyu-Seok Cho, Eung-Jin Shin, Moon-Soo Lee, Hyung-Chul Kim, Ok-Pyung Song

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of gastroenterology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02013596 (Effect of Transcutaneous Electrical Acupoint Stimulation), which is not on this map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02013596 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2013, after this paper: background citation

Effect of Transcutaneous Electrical Acupoint Stimulation(TEAS) on the Hepatic and Renal Function Impaired by Pneumoperitoneum: a Prospective, Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorZhihong LURan2013 to 2015Enrolled168ConditionsHepatic Dysfunction Transient, Renal Function DisorderArmsTEAS pretreatment, TEAS treatment
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Influence of liver function after laparoscopy-assistedWorld journal of gastrointestinal surgery · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Cardiac and Liver Marker Alterations After Laparoscopic Gynaecologic Operations.Turkish journal of anaesthesiology and reanimation · 2015
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Gui-Ae JeongDepartment of Surgery, Soonchunhyang University College of Medicine, Bucheon-si, 420-767 Gyeonggi-do, South Korea.
Gyu-Seok Cho
Eung-Jin Shin
Moon-Soo Lee
Hyung-Chul Kim
Ok-Pyung Song
Soonchunhyang University · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimTo evaluate the factors associated with liver function alterations after laparoscopy-assisted gastrectomy (LAG) for gastric cancer.

methodsWe collected the data of gastrectomy patients with gastric cancer and divided them into 2 groups: open gastrectomy (OG) and LAG. We also collected the data of patients with colon cancer to evaluate the effect of liver manipulations during surgery on liver function alterations. Serum aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), total bilirubin, and alkaline phosphatase were measured on the preoperative day and postoperative day 1 (POD1), POD3, POD5, and POD7.

resultsNo changes in liver function were observed after the operation in patients with colon cancer (n = 121). However, in gastric cancer patients (n = 215), AST and ALT levels increased until POD5 compared to those in colon cancer patients and these findings were observed both in the LAG and OG without a significant difference except at POD1. The mean hepatic enzyme levels at POD1 in the LAG group were significantly higher than those in the OG group (P = 0.047 for AST and P = 0.039 for ALT). The factors associated with elevated ALT on POD1 in patients with gastric cancer were body mass index (P < 0.001), operation time (P < 0.001), intraoperative hepatic injury (P = 0.048), and ligation of an aberrant left hepatic artery (P = 0.052) but not type of operation (OG vs LAG, P = 0.094).

conclusionWe conclude that the liver function alteration after LAG may have been caused by direct liver manipulation or aberrant hepatic artery ligation rather than the CO₂ pneumoperitoneum.

Indexed as

AdultAgedFemaleGastrectomyHumansLaparoscopyLiverLiver Function TestsMaleMiddle AgedPostoperative ComplicationsPostoperative PeriodRetrospective StudiesStomach NeoplasmsGastric cancerLaparoscopy-assisted gastrectomyLiver functionPneumoperitoneum

Identifiers

PMID21253398
PMCPMC3022299
OpenAlexW2115940455

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.