Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21252376›Full record

ArticleMedical care research and review : MCRR2011

Qualitative methods in health services and management research: pockets of excellence and progress, but still a long way to go.

Kelly J Devers

Abstract readComment
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Medical care research and review : MCRR, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Qualitative Research Leaders: Evaluation of Pilot Global Pipeline Program.The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Aging and orthopedics: how a lifespan development model can inform practice and research.Canadian journal of surgery. Journal canadien de chirurgie · 2016
    Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Kelly J DeversUrban Institute, Health Policy Center, Washington, DC 20037, USA. kdevers@urban.org

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The 10-year systematic review of published health services and management research by Weiner et al. (2011) chronicles the contributions of qualitative methods, highlights areas of substantial progress, and identifies areas in need of more progress. This article (Devers, 2011) discusses possible reasons for lack of progress in some areas--related to the under-supply of well-trained qualitative researchers and more tangible demand for their research--and mechanisms for future improvement. To ensure a robust health services research toolbox, the field must take additional steps to provide stronger education and training in qualitative methods and more funding and publication opportunities. Given the rapidly changing health care system post the passage of national health reform and the chalresearch issues associated with it, the health services research and management field will not meet its future challenges with quantitative methods alone or with a half-empty toolbox.

Indexed as

Qualitative ResearchDelivery of Health CareEconomic CompetitionHealth Care ReformHealth PolicyHealth Services AccessibilityHealth Services ResearchHealth SurveysHumansInsurance, HealthResearch DesignResearch Personnel

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.