Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21251263›Full record

ArticleBMC plant biology2011

Development of genic-SSR markers by deep transcriptome sequencing in pigeonpea [Cajanus cajan (L.) Millspaugh].

Sutapa Dutta, Giriraj Kumawat, Bikram P Singh, Deepak K Gupta, Sangeeta Singh, Vivek Dogra, Kishor Gaikwad, Tilak R Sharma, Ranjeet S Raje, Tapas K Bandhopadhya and 8 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC plant biology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 109 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
109citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

109 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. De Novo Transcriptome Assembly of Rice Bean (Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  2. The MYB Transcription FactorInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Genetic analysis of sucrose concentration in soybean seeds using a historical soybean genomic panel.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Frontiers in plant science · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Development of EST-SSR markers forPhysiology and molecular biology of plants : an international journal of functional plant biology · 2020
    Article
  19. Genomics-assisted breeding for pigeonpea improvement.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2020
    Review
  20. Article

49 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Sutapa DuttaNational Research Centre on Plant Biotechnology, Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi 110 012, India.
Giriraj Kumawat
Bikram P Singh
Deepak K Gupta
Sangeeta Singh
Vivek Dogra
Kishor Gaikwad
Tilak R Sharma
Ranjeet S Raje
Tapas K Bandhopadhya
Subhojit Datta
Mahendra N Singh
Fakrudin Bashasab
Pawan Kulwal
K B Wanjari
Rajeev K Varshney
Douglas R Cook
Nagendra K Singh

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPigeonpea [Cajanus cajan (L.) Millspaugh], one of the most important food legumes of semi-arid tropical and subtropical regions, has limited genomic resources, particularly expressed sequence based (genic) markers. We report a comprehensive set of validated genic simple sequence repeat (SSR) markers using deep transcriptome sequencing, and its application in genetic diversity analysis and mapping.

resultsIn this study, 43,324 transcriptome shotgun assembly unigene contigs were assembled from 1.696 million 454 GS-FLX sequence reads of separate pooled cDNA libraries prepared from leaf, root, stem and immature seed of two pigeonpea varieties, Asha and UPAS 120. A total of 3,771 genic-SSR loci, excluding homopolymeric and compound repeats, were identified; of which 2,877 PCR primer pairs were designed for marker development. Dinucleotide was the most common repeat motif with a frequency of 60.41%, followed by tri- (34.52%), hexa- (2.62%), tetra- (1.67%) and pentanucleotide (0.76%) repeat motifs. Primers were synthesized and tested for 772 of these loci with repeat lengths of ≥ 18 bp. Of these, 550 markers were validated for consistent amplification in eight diverse pigeonpea varieties; 71 were found to be polymorphic on agarose gel electrophoresis. Genetic diversity analysis was done on 22 pigeonpea varieties and eight wild species using 20 highly polymorphic genic-SSR markers. The number of alleles at these loci ranged from 4-10 and the polymorphism information content values ranged from 0.46 to 0.72. Neighbor-joining dendrogram showed distinct separation of the different groups of pigeonpea cultivars and wild species. Deep transcriptome sequencing of the two parental lines helped in silico identification of polymorphic genic-SSR loci to facilitate the rapid development of an intra-species reference genetic map, a subset of which was validated for expected allelic segregation in the reference mapping population.

conclusionWe developed 550 validated genic-SSR markers in pigeonpea using deep transcriptome sequencing. From these, 20 highly polymorphic markers were used to evaluate the genetic relationship among species of the genus Cajanus. A comprehensive set of genic-SSR markers was developed as an important genomic resource for diversity analysis and genetic mapping in pigeonpea.

Indexed as

Gene Expression ProfilingAllelesCajanusComputational BiologyGene Expression Regulation, PlantGenes, PlantGenetic LociGenetic MarkersGenotypeHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingMinisatellite RepeatsPhylogenyPolymorphism, GeneticReproducibility of ResultsSpecies SpecificityGenetic Markers

Identifiers

PMID21251263
PMCPMC3036606

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.