Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21250981›Full record

ReviewBritish journal of pharmacology2011

Inhaled innate immune ligands to prevent pneumonia.

Scott E Evans, Michael J Tuvim, Cory J Fox, Nidhi Sachdev, Leonid Gibiansky, Burton F Dickey

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in British journal of pharmacology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. The effect of aerosolized bacterial lysate on experimentally inducedCanadian journal of veterinary research = Revue canadienne de recherche veterinaire · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Reply to YasumaAmerican journal of respiratory and critical care medicine · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Airway Epithelial Innate Immunity.Frontiers in physiology · 2021
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Immune Modulation to Improve Survival of Viral Pneumonia in Mice.American journal of respiratory cell and molecular biology · 2020
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Scott E EvansDepartment of Pulmonary Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA.
Michael J Tuvim
Cory J Fox
Nidhi Sachdev
Leonid Gibiansky
Burton F Dickey

Funding

Tumor Evolution and Metastasis ProgramP30CA016672 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI Scott Kopetz · 1985 to 2026
$290.8M
Stimulated Innate Resistance of the Lungs to Bioterror pathogensU01AI082226 · NIAID · TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCE CTR · PI HOOK, AXEL MAGNUS · 2009 to 2013
$2.2M
NCI NIH HHS CA016672NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016672NIAID NIH HHS AI82226NIAID NIH HHS U01 AI082226
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Epithelial surfaces throughout the body continuously sample and respond to environmental stimuli. The accessibility of lung epithelium to inhaled therapies makes it possible to stimulate local antimicrobial defences with aerosolized innate immune ligands. This strategy has been shown to be effective in preclinical models, as delivery of innate immune ligands to the lungs of laboratory animals results in protection from subsequent challenge with microbial pathogens. Survival of the animal host in this setting correlates directly with killing of pathogens within the lungs, indicating the induction of a resistance mechanism. Resistance appears to be mediated primarily by activated epithelial cells rather than recruited leucocytes. Resistance reaches a peak within hours and persists for several days. Innate immune ligands can interact synergistically under some circumstances, and synergistic combinations of innate ligands delivered by aerosol are capable of inducing a high level of broad host resistance to bacteria, fungi and viruses. The induction of innate antimicrobial resistance within the lungs could have clinical applications in the prevention of lower respiratory tract infection in subjects transiently at high risk. These include cancer patients undergoing myeloablative chemotherapy, intubated patients being mechanically ventilated, vulnerable individuals during seasonal influenza epidemics, asthmatic subjects experiencing a respiratory viral infection, and healthy subjects exposed to virulent pathogens from a bioterror attack or emergent pandemic. In summary, stimulation of the lung epithelium to induce localized resistance to infection is a novel strategy whose clinical utility will be assessed in the near future.

Indexed as

Administration, InhalationAnimalsEpithelial CellsHumansImmunity, InnateLigandsLungPneumoniaLigands

Identifiers

PMID21250981
PMCPMC3085878

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.