SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2011
Botulinum toxin injections for low-back pain and sciatica.
Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 57 citations in OpenAlex.
- Neuromodulators for pain management in rheumatoid arthritis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2012Pooled it
- Are paraspinous intramuscular injections of botulinum toxin a (BoNT-A) efficient in the treatment of chronic low-back pain? A randomised, double-blinded crossover trial.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2017Trial
- Pharmacological treatments for low back pain in adults: an overview of Cochrane Reviews.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2023Review
- Diagnosis and Management of Neuropathic Pain in Spine Diseases.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Review
- [Therapeutic injections and manual medicine in low-back pain : Bimodal synergies between evidence and empiricism].Der Orthopade · 2022Review
- Novel botulinum neurotoxin-A tibial nerve perineural injection to alleviate overactive bladder symptoms in male rats.Animal cells and systems · 2022Article
- [The piriformis syndrome-a special indication for botulinum toxin].Der Nervenarzt · 2020Review
- Benefits, Safety, and Adjunct Modality Prevalences of Long-Term Botulinum Toxin Injections for Cervical Dystonia and Myofascial Neck Pain: A Retrospective Cohort Study.Journal of pain research · 2020Article
- Non-Specific Low Back Pain.Deutsches Arzteblatt international · 2017Review
- Botulinum neurotoxin type A for the treatment of pain: not just in migraine and trigeminal neuralgia.The journal of headache and pain · 2017Review
- Surgical Treatment of Piriformis Syndrome.Clinics in orthopedic surgery · 2017Article
- Action mechanisms of Onabotulinum toxin-A: hints for selection of eligible patients.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2017Review
- Piriformis syndrome: a case series of 31 Bangladeshi people with literature review.European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2017Review
- Effective treatment options for musculoskeletal pain in primary care: A systematic overview of current evidence.PloS one · 2017Review
- [Botulinum toxin type A in headache treatment : Established and experimental indications].Der Nervenarzt · 2016Article
- Chronic refractory myofascial pain and denervation supersensitivity as global public health disease.BMJ case reports · 2016Article
- Review
- Low Back Pain in Athletes.Asian journal of sports medicine · 2015Review
- What Does the Cochrane Collaboration Say about the Use of Botulinum in Rehabilitation?Physiotherapy Canada. Physiotherapie Canada · 2015Article
- Mechanical low back pain--a rheumatologist's view.Nature reviews. Rheumatology · 2013Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAdequate relief from low-back pain (LBP) is not always possible. Emerging evidence suggests a role for botulinum neurotoxin (BoNT) injections in treating pain disorders. Proponents of BoNT suggest its properties can decrease muscle spasms, ischemia and inflammatory markers, thereby reducing pain.
objectivesTo determine the effects of botulinum toxin injections in adults with LBP. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched CENTRAL (The Cochrane Library 2009, issue 3) and MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CINAHL to August 2009; screened references from included studies; consulted with content experts and Allergan. We included published and unpublished randomised controlled trials without language restrictions SELECTION CRITERIA: We included randomised trials that evaluated BoNT serotypes versus other treatments in patients with non-specific LBP of any duration. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors selected the studies, assessed the risk of bias using the Cochrane Back Review Group criteria, and extracted the data using standardized forms. We performed a qualitative analysis due to lack of data. MAIN
resultsWe excluded evidence from nineteen studies due to non-randomisation, incomplete or unpublished data. We included three randomised trials (N =123 patients). Only one study included patients with chronic non-specific LBP; the other two examined unique subpopulations. Only one of the three trials had a low risk of bias and demonstrated that BoNT injections reduced pain at three and eight weeks and improved function at eight weeks better than saline injections. The second trial showed that BoNT injections were better than injections of corticosteroid plus lidocaine or placebo in patients with sciatica attributed to piriformis syndrome. The third trial concluded that BoNT injections were better than traditional acupuncture in patients with third lumbar transverse process syndrome. Both studies with high risk of bias had several key limitations. Heterogeneity of the studies prevented meta-analysis. There is low quality evidence that BoNT injections improved pain, function, or both better than saline injections and very low quality evidence that they were better than acupuncture or steroid injections. AUTHORS'
conclusionsWe identified three studies that investigated the merits of BoNT for LBP, but only one had a low risk of bias and evaluated patients with non-specific LBP (N = 31). Further research is very likely to have an important impact on the estimate of effect and our confidence in it. Future trials should standardize patient populations, treatment protocols and comparison groups, enlist more participants and include long-term outcomes, cost-benefit analysis and clinical relevance of findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.