SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2011
Non-antiepileptic drugs for trigeminal neuralgia.
Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.
- Non-antiepileptic drugs for trigeminal neuralgia.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2013Pooled it
- Therapeutic efficacy and safety of botulinum toxin type A in trigeminal neuralgia: a systematic review.The journal of headache and pain · 2013Pooled it
- Neurosurgical interventions for the treatment of classical trigeminal neuralgia.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2011Pooled it
- Randomized trial of betahistine mesilate tablets as augmentation for oxcarbazepine and carbamazepine in treating vestibular paroxysmia.Drug design, development and therapy · 2018Trial
- Trial
- Current and Innovative Pharmacological Options to Treat Typical and Atypical Trigeminal Neuralgia.Drugs · 2018Review
- Trigeminal Neuralgia, Glossopharyngeal Neuralgia, and Myofascial Pain Dysfunction Syndrome: An Update.Pain research & management · 2017Review
- Vestibular paroxysmia: a treatable neurovascular cross-compression syndrome.Journal of neurology · 2016Review
- Update on neuropathic pain treatment for trigeminal neuralgia. The pharmacological and surgical options.Neurosciences (Riyadh, Saudi Arabia) · 2015Review
- Management of chronic neuropathic pain: a protocol for a multiple treatment comparison meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.BMJ open · 2014Article
- An uncommonly common: Glossopharyngeal neuralgia.Annals of Indian Academy of Neurology · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
- Update of
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundNon-antiepileptic drugs have been used in the management of trigeminal neuralgia since the 1970s.
objectivesThe objective was to systematically review the efficacy and tolerability of non-antiepileptic drugs for trigeminal neuralgia. SEARCH STRATEGY: For this updated review we searched the Cochrane Neuromuscular Disease Group Specialized Register (30 April 2010). We also searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library 2010, Issue 2), MEDLINE (January 1966 to April 2010), EMBASE (January 1980 to April 2010), LILACS (January 1982 to April 2010) and the Chinese Biomedical Retrieval System (1978 to April 2010). We handsearched 10 Chinese journals. SELECTION CRITERIA: We searched for double-blind randomized or quasi-randomized controlled trials in which the active drug was used for at least two weeks. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two authors decided which trials fitted the inclusion criteria and independently graded risk of bias. MAIN
resultsFour trials involving 139 participants were included. The primary outcome measure in each was pain relief. Three trials with an unclear risk of bias compared one of the non-antiepileptic drugs tizanidine, tocainide or pimozide with carbamazepine. In a trial of tizanidine involving 12 participants (one dropped out due to unrelated disease) one of five treated with tizanidine and four of six treated with carbamazepine improved, risk ratio 0.30 (95% CI 0.05 to 1.89). Few side effects were noted with tizanidine. In a study involving 12 participants there was an improvement in mean pain scores with tocainide similar to that with carbamazepine, but significant side effects limited its use. In the pimozide study more participants improved on pimozide (48/48) than with carbamazepine (27/48) (risk ratio 1.76, 95% CI 1.37 to 2.26). Up to 83% of participants reported adverse effects but these did not lead to withdrawal from the study. A trial with low risk of bias involving 47 participants compared 0.5% proparacaine hydrochloride eyedrops with placebo but did not show any significant benefits or side effects. AUTHORS'
conclusionsOf the four studies identified, one had low and three an unclear risk of bias. There is insufficient evidence from randomized controlled trials to show significant benefit from non-antiepileptic drugs in trigeminal neuralgia. More research is needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.