Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21249658›Full record

SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2011

Non-antiepileptic drugs for trigeminal neuralgia.

Mi Yang, Muke Zhou, Li He, Ning Chen, Joanna M Zakrzewska

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Non-antiepileptic drugs for trigeminal neuralgia.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2013
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. An uncommonly common: Glossopharyngeal neuralgia.Annals of Indian Academy of Neurology · 2013
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Mi YangDepartment of Neurology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, No. 37, Guo Xue Xiang, Chengdu, Sichuan, China, 610041.
Muke Zhou
Li He
Ning Chen
Joanna M Zakrzewska
Sichuan University · CNWest China Hospital of Sichuan University · CNEastman Dental Hospital · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNon-antiepileptic drugs have been used in the management of trigeminal neuralgia since the 1970s.

objectivesThe objective was to systematically review the efficacy and tolerability of non-antiepileptic drugs for trigeminal neuralgia. SEARCH STRATEGY: For this updated review we searched the Cochrane Neuromuscular Disease Group Specialized Register (30 April 2010). We also searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library 2010, Issue 2), MEDLINE (January 1966 to April 2010), EMBASE (January 1980 to April 2010), LILACS (January 1982 to April 2010) and the Chinese Biomedical Retrieval System (1978 to April 2010). We handsearched 10 Chinese journals. SELECTION CRITERIA: We searched for double-blind randomized or quasi-randomized controlled trials in which the active drug was used for at least two weeks. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two authors decided which trials fitted the inclusion criteria and independently graded risk of bias. MAIN

resultsFour trials involving 139 participants were included. The primary outcome measure in each was pain relief. Three trials with an unclear risk of bias compared one of the non-antiepileptic drugs tizanidine, tocainide or pimozide with carbamazepine. In a trial of tizanidine involving 12 participants (one dropped out due to unrelated disease) one of five treated with tizanidine and four of six treated with carbamazepine improved, risk ratio 0.30 (95% CI 0.05 to 1.89). Few side effects were noted with tizanidine. In a study involving 12 participants there was an improvement in mean pain scores with tocainide similar to that with carbamazepine, but significant side effects limited its use. In the pimozide study more participants improved on pimozide (48/48) than with carbamazepine (27/48) (risk ratio 1.76, 95% CI 1.37 to 2.26). Up to 83% of participants reported adverse effects but these did not lead to withdrawal from the study. A trial with low risk of bias involving 47 participants compared 0.5% proparacaine hydrochloride eyedrops with placebo but did not show any significant benefits or side effects. AUTHORS'

conclusionsOf the four studies identified, one had low and three an unclear risk of bias. There is insufficient evidence from randomized controlled trials to show significant benefit from non-antiepileptic drugs in trigeminal neuralgia. More research is needed.

Indexed as

AmitriptylineAnalgesicsBaclofenCarbamazepineClomipramineClonidineHumansPimozidePropoxycaineRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicTocainideTrigeminal NeuralgiaAmitriptylineAnalgesicsBaclofenCarbamazepineClomipramineClonidinePimozidePropoxycaineTocainide

Identifiers

PMID21249658
OpenAlexW4238745727

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.