SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2011
Bile acids for primary sclerosing cholangitis.
Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
27 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 95 citations in OpenAlex.
- Systematic review: microbial manipulation as therapy for primary sclerosing cholangitis.Alimentary pharmacology & therapeutics · 2023Pooled it
- [Guidelines on the diagnosis and management of primary sclerosing cholangitis (2021)].Zhonghua gan zang bing za zhi = Zhonghua ganzangbing zazhi = Chinese journal of hepatology · 2022Guideline
- Clinical practice guidelines for IgG4-related sclerosing cholangitis.Journal of hepato-biliary-pancreatic sciences · 2019Guideline
- Clinical guidelines for primary sclerosing cholangitis 2017.Journal of gastroenterology · 2018Guideline
- Fenofibrate in primary sclerosing cholangitis; a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.Pharmacology research & perspectives · 2022Trial
- Evaluation and management of primary sclerosing cholangitis patients awaiting liver transplantation.JHEP reports : innovation in hepatology · 2026Review
- Primary sclerosing cholangitis.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2025Review
- Liver transplant in primary sclerosing cholangitis: Current trends and future directions.World journal of hepatology · 2023Review
- Primary sclerosing cholangitis hospitalizations in the United States: characteristics and predictors of clinical outcomes.Proceedings (Baylor University. Medical Center) · 2023Article
- Structural basis and molecular mechanism of biased GPBAR signaling in regulating NSCLC cell growth via YAP activity.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022Article
- The gut-liver axis in cholangiopathies: focus on bile acid based pharmacological treatment.Current opinion in gastroenterology · 2022Review
- Current and emerging adjuvant therapies in biliary atresia.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2022Review
- Extraintestinal Manifestations of Inflammatory Bowel Disease: Current Concepts, Treatment, and Implications for Disease Management.Gastroenterology · 2021Review
- Bile Acid Profiles in Primary Sclerosing Cholangitis and Their Ability to Predict Hepatic Decompensation.Hepatology (Baltimore, Md.) · 2021Article
- The Management of Cholestatic Liver Diseases: Current Therapies and Emerging New Possibilities.Journal of clinical medicine · 2021Review
- Test performance and predictors of accuracy of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration for diagnosing biliary strictures or masses.Endoscopy international open · 2020Article
- Emerging therapies in primary sclerosing cholangitis: pathophysiological basis and clinical opportunities.Journal of gastroenterology · 2020Review
- [Primary sclerosing cholangitis : Current diagnostics and treatment].Der Internist · 2018Review
- Cholestatic liver diseases: new targets, new therapies.Therapeutic advances in gastroenterology · 2018Review
- Pharmacological interventions for primary sclerosing cholangitis: an attempted network meta-analysis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2017Review
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPrimary sclerosing cholangitis is a progressive chronic cholestatic liver disease that usually leads to the development of cirrhosis. Studies evaluating bile acids in the treatment of primary sclerosing cholangitis have shown a potential benefit of their use. However, no influence on patients survival and disease outcome has yet been proven.
objectivesTo assess the beneficial and harmful effects of bile acids for patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched The Cochrane Hepato-Biliary Group Controlled Trials Register, The Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, EMBASE and Science Citation Index Expanded generally from inception through to October 2010. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised clinical trials comparing any dose of bile acids or duration of treatment versus placebo, no intervention, or another intervention were included irrespective of blinding, language, or publication status. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two authors extracted data independently. We evaluated the risk of bias of the trials using prespecified domains. We performed the meta-analysis according to the intention-to-treat principle. We presented outcomes as relative risks (RR) or mean differences (MD), both with 95% confidence intervals (CI). MAIN
resultsEight trials evaluated ursodeoxycholic acid versus placebo or no intervention (592 patients). The eight randomised clinical trials have a high risk of bias. Patients were treated for three months to six years (median three years). The dosage of ursodeoxycholic acid used in the trials ranged from low (10 mg/kg body weight/day) to high (28 to 30 mg/kg body weight/day). Ursodeoxycholic acid did not significantly reduce the risk of death (RR 1.00; 95% CI 0.46 to 2.20); treatment failure including liver transplantation, varices, ascites, and encephalopathy (RR 1.22; 95% CI 0.91 to 1.64); liver histological deterioration (RR 0.89; 95% CI 0.45 to 1.74); or liver cholangiographic deterioration (RR 0.60; 95% CI 0.23 to 1.57). Ursodeoxycholic acid significantly improved serum bilirubin (MD -14.6 µmol/litre; 95% CI -18.7 to -10.6), alkaline phosphatases (MD -506 IU/litre; 95% CI -583 to -430), aspartate aminotransferase (MD -46 IU/litre; 95% CI -77 to -16), and gamma-glutamyltranspeptidase (MD -260 IU/litre; 95% CI -315 to -205), but not albumin (MD -0.20 g/litre; 95% CI -1.91 to 1.50). Ursodeoxycholic acid was safe and well tolerated by patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis. AUTHORS'
conclusionsWe did not find enough evidence to support or refute the use of bile acids in the treatment of primary sclerosing cholangitis. However, bile acids seem to lead to a significant improvement in liver biochemistry. Therefore, more randomised trials are needed before any of the bile acids can be recommended for this indication.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.