Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21249410›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology2011

Evaluation of discrepancies between oxacillin and cefoxitin susceptibility in coagulase-negative staphylococci.

K-H Hung, J-J Yan, Y-C Lu, H-M Chen, J-J Wu

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Evaluation of discrepancies between oxacillin and cefoxitin disk susceptibility for detecting methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2011
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

K-H HungDepartment of Medical Laboratory Science and Biotechnology, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, No. 1 University Rd., Tainan 70101, Taiwan.
J-J Yan
Y-C Lu
H-M Chen
J-J Wu
National Cheng Kung University Hospital · TWNational Cheng Kung University · TW

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) recommends testing coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS) strains to determine resistance against oxacillin by testing for mecA, PBP2a, or with cefoxitin disk. However, discrepant results of resistance to oxacillin and susceptibility to cefoxitin were found. In this study, we aimed to investigate the oxacillin resistance and cefoxitin susceptibility of CoNS in Taiwan. Of 9,017 strains collected from 2005 to 2010, 131 (1.5%) of the isolates were oxacillin-resistant and cefoxitin-susceptible. Species identification was carried out using the Vitek 2 system or 16S ribosomal RNA sequencing. Oxacillin minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) were examined by the agar dilution method. The presence of mecA and the activity of β-lactamase were performed by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and Cefinase disks, respectively. Overall, 33% (43/129) of the strains carried mecA and 43% (37/86) of mecA-negative isolates tested positive for β-lactamase. The remaining 49 isolates were negative for both mecA and β-lactamase, and were mainly Staphylococcus cohnii ssp. urealyticus and S. saprophyticus (oxacillin MICs 0.5-2 μg/ml) obtained from bloodstream and urinary tract infections. Our study suggests that incorrect reporting can be found in CoNS using cefoxitin disk alone to determine the susceptibility to oxacillin, and the strains should be further tested for oxacillin MICs and detection of the mecA gene or β-lactamase activity.

Indexed as

beta-Lactam ResistanceAnti-Bacterial AgentsBacterial Typing TechniquesCefoxitinCoagulaseGenotypeHumansMicrobial Sensitivity TestsOxacillinPolymerase Chain ReactionRNA, Ribosomal, 16SSequence Analysis, DNAStaphylococcal InfectionsStaphylococcusTaiwanAnti-Bacterial AgentsCefoxitinCoagulaseOxacillinRNA, Ribosomal, 16S

Identifiers

PMID21249410
OpenAlexW2028496327

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.