ArticleEuropean journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology2011
Evaluation of discrepancies between oxacillin and cefoxitin susceptibility in coagulase-negative staphylococci.
Article in European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Prevalence of the Antibiotic Resistance Genes in Coagulase-Positive-and Negative-Frontiers in microbiology · 2016Article
- Reply to "use of alternative reference standards and exempted species to evaluate the performance of the Vitek 2 GP67 cefoxitin/oxacillin screen for coagulase-negative staphylococci".Journal of clinical microbiology · 2015Article
- Detection of methicillin-resistant coagulase-negative staphylococci by the Vitek 2 system.Journal of clinical microbiology · 2014Article
- Evaluation of discrepancies between oxacillin and cefoxitin disk susceptibility for detecting methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2011Article
- First documented case of a Staphylococcus lugdunensis strain carrying the mecA gene in Northern Europe.Infection ecology & epidemiology · 2011Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) recommends testing coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS) strains to determine resistance against oxacillin by testing for mecA, PBP2a, or with cefoxitin disk. However, discrepant results of resistance to oxacillin and susceptibility to cefoxitin were found. In this study, we aimed to investigate the oxacillin resistance and cefoxitin susceptibility of CoNS in Taiwan. Of 9,017 strains collected from 2005 to 2010, 131 (1.5%) of the isolates were oxacillin-resistant and cefoxitin-susceptible. Species identification was carried out using the Vitek 2 system or 16S ribosomal RNA sequencing. Oxacillin minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) were examined by the agar dilution method. The presence of mecA and the activity of β-lactamase were performed by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and Cefinase disks, respectively. Overall, 33% (43/129) of the strains carried mecA and 43% (37/86) of mecA-negative isolates tested positive for β-lactamase. The remaining 49 isolates were negative for both mecA and β-lactamase, and were mainly Staphylococcus cohnii ssp. urealyticus and S. saprophyticus (oxacillin MICs 0.5-2 μg/ml) obtained from bloodstream and urinary tract infections. Our study suggests that incorrect reporting can be found in CoNS using cefoxitin disk alone to determine the susceptibility to oxacillin, and the strains should be further tested for oxacillin MICs and detection of the mecA gene or β-lactamase activity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.