Dual-use research and technological diffusion: reconsidering the bioterrorism threat spectrum.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Development of a Biosecurity Checklist for Laboratory Assessment and Monitoring.Applied biosafety : journal of the American Biological Safety Association · 2019
   Article
2. The dual use of research ethics committees: why professional self-governance falls short in preserving biosecurity.BMC medical ethics · 2018
   Article
3. Biological Dual-Use Research and Synthetic Biology of Yeast.Science and engineering ethics · 2017
   Article
4. Observed and projected drivers of emerging infectious diseases in Europe.Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · 2016
   Review
5. Biological Risks and Laboratory-Acquired Infections: A Reality That Cannot be Ignored in Health Biotechnology.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2015
   Review
6. Evolution of different dual-use concepts in international and national law and its implications on research ethics and governance.Science and engineering ethics · 2014
   Review
7. Biological warfare, bioterrorism, and biocrime.Clinical microbiology and infection : the official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases · 2014
   Review
8. Restricted science.Frontiers in public health · 2014
   Article
9. Dual-use research debates and public health: better integration would do no harm.Frontiers in public health · 2014
   Article
10. Synthetic genomics and synthetic biology applications between hopes and concerns.Current genomics · 2013
    Article
11. One study, two paths: the challenge of dual-use research.Environmental health perspectives · 2012
    Article
12. Future infectious disease threats to Europe.American journal of public health · 2011
    Article
13. Requirements and design of the PROSPER protocol for implementation of information infrastructures supporting pandemic response: a Nominal Group study.PloS one · 2011
    Article

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as