Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21248379›Full record

ArticleJournal of neural engineering2011

Multiple components of ganglion cell desensitization in response to prosthetic stimulation.

Daniel K Freeman, Shelley I Fried

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neural engineering, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Adaptation of visual responses in degeneratingFrontiers in neuroscience · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Retinal ganglion cells encode the direction of motion outside their classical receptive field.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Predicting the Temporal Dynamics of Prosthetic Vision.Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. Annual International Conference · 2024
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Multiple consecutive-biphasic pulse stimulation improves spatially localized firing of retinal ganglion cells in the degenerate retina.The Korean journal of physiology & pharmacology : official journal of the Korean Physiological Society and the Korean Society of Pharmacology · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Selective Activation of Retinal Ganglion Cell Subtypes Through Targeted Electrical Stimulation Parameters.IEEE transactions on neural systems and rehabilitation engineering : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Targeted Stimulation of Retinal Ganglion Cells in Epiretinal Prostheses: A Multiscale Computational Study.IEEE transactions on neural systems and rehabilitation engineering : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society · 2020
    Article
  17. Article
  18. An update on retinal prostheses.Clinical neurophysiology : official journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2020
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Daniel K FreemanCenter for Innovative Visual Rehabilitation, Boston VA Healthcare System, 150 South Huntington Ave, Boston, MA 02130, USA.
Shelley I Fried

Funding

The mechanism by which electric stimulation activates retinal neuronsR01EY019967 · NEI · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI FRIED, SHELLEY · 2010 to 2014
$1.9M
NEI NIH HHS R01 EY019967NEI NIH HHS R01 EY-019967-01
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Retinal prostheses aim to restore functional vision to those blinded by outer retinal diseases using electric stimulation of surviving neurons. Previous work indicates that repetitive stimulation with stimuli that activate the synaptic network reduces the sensitivity of retinal neurons to further stimulation. Such desensitization may contribute to the fading of visual percepts over time reported by human subjects. Here, we show that desensitization may be more complex than previously considered. We recorded spike trains from rabbit retinal ganglion cells and found that desensitization persists in the presence of inhibitory blockers (strychnine and picrotoxin), indicating amacrine cell inhibition is not solely responsible for reducing sensitivity in response to electric stimulation. The threshold for direct activation of the ganglion cell changes little during the simultaneous desensitization of the synaptically mediated response, indicating that desensitization likely occurs upstream of the spike generator. In addition to rapid desensitization acting over hundreds of milliseconds (τ = 176.4 ± 8.8 ms), we report the presence of slow acting desensitization with a time course of seconds (τ = 14.0 ± 1.1 s). The time courses of the two components of desensitization that we found are similar to the two phases of brightness fading seen in human subjects. This suggests that the reduction in ganglion cell firing due to desensitization may be responsible for the fading of visual percepts over time in response to prosthetic stimulation.

Indexed as

Visual ProsthesisAction PotentialsAnimalsModels, NeurologicalPhotic StimulationProsthesis DesignRabbitsRetinal Ganglion Cells

Identifiers

PMID21248379
PMCPMC3048167

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.