Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21248359›Full record

Trial reportJournal of dental research2011

Angiogenic biomarkers and healing of living cellular constructs.

T Morelli, R Neiva, M L Nevins, M K McGuire, E T Scheyer, T-J Oh, T M Braun, J E Nör, D Bates, W V Giannobile

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract readComparative StudyMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of dental research, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01134081 nacompletednot on this map

Expression of Angiogenic Biomarkers During Healing of Intra-Oral Soft Tissue Engineered Grafts

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of MichiganRan2008 to 2008Enrolled44ConditionsGingival RecessionArmsCelTx™, Free Gingival Graft
NCT03498911 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2018, after this paper: background citation

Comparison of Envelope Coronally Advanced Flap and Modified Tunnel Technique in Soft Tissue Dehiscence Coverage Around Implants: A Randomized Clinical Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of MichiganRan2018 to 2022Enrolled28ConditionsDental ImplantsArmsMucogingival surgery
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Wound fluid sampling methods for proteomic studies: A scoping review.Wound repair and regeneration : official publication of the Wound Healing Society [and] the European Tissue Repair Society · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Bone repair cells for craniofacial regeneration.Advanced drug delivery reviews · 2012
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

T MorelliDepartment of Periodontics & Oral Medicine, School of Dentistry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
R Neiva
M L Nevins
M K McGuire
E T Scheyer
T-J Oh
T M Braun
J E Nör
D Bates
W V Giannobile

Funding

MICHIGAN INSTITUTE FOR CLINICAL AND HEALTH RESEARCH (MICHR) (UL1): (BPCA)UL1RR024986 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI SHANLEY, THOMAS P. · 2007 to 2011
$51.2M
NCRR NIH HHS UL1 RR024986NCRR NIH HHS UL 1RR024986
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The use of intra-oral soft-tissue-engineered devices has demonstrated potential for oral mucosa regeneration. The aim of this study was to investigate the temporal expression of angiogenic biomarkers during wound healing of soft tissue reconstructive procedures comparing living cellular constructs (LCC) with autogenous free gingival grafts. Forty-four human participants bilaterally lacking sufficient zones of attached keratinized gingiva were randomly assigned to soft tissue surgery plus either LCC or autograft. Wound fluid samples were collected at baseline and weeks 1, 2, 3, and 4 post-operatively and analyzed for a panel of angiogenic biomarkers: angiogenin (ANG), angiostatin (ANT), PDGF-BB, VEGF, FGF-2, IL-8, TIMP-1, TIMP-2, GM-CSF, and IP-10. Results demonstrated a significant increase in expression of ANT, PDGF-BB, VEGF, FGF-2, and IL-8 for the LCC group over the autograft group at the early stages of wound repair. Although angiogenic biomarkers were modestly elevated for the LCC group, no clinical correlation with wound healing was found. This human investigation demonstrates that, during early wound-healing events, expression of angiogenic-related biomarkers is up-regulated in sites treated with LCC compared with autogenous free gingival grafts, which may provide a safe and effective alternative for regenerating intra-oral soft tissues (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01134081).

Indexed as

Tissue ScaffoldsAngiogenesis Inducing AgentsAngiogenesis InhibitorsAngiogenic ProteinsAngiostatinsBecaplerminBiomarkersChemokine CXCL10Cohort StudiesFeasibility StudiesFemaleFibroblast Growth Factor 2FibroblastsFollow-Up StudiesGingivaGingival Crevicular FluidAngiogenesis Inducing AgentsAngiogenesis InhibitorsAngiogenic ProteinsangiogeninAngiostatinsBecaplerminBiomarkersChemokine CXCL10CXCL10 protein, humanFibroblast Growth Factor 2Granulocyte-Macrophage Colony-Stimulating FactorInterleukin-8Platelet-Derived Growth FactorProto-Oncogene Proteins c-sisRibonuclease, PancreaticTissue Inhibitor of Metalloproteinase-1Tissue Inhibitor of Metalloproteinase-2Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor AVEGFA protein, human

Identifiers

PMID21248359
PMCPMC3144125

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.