ArticleClinical and vaccine immunology : CVI2011
Serum antibody kinetics following nasal or parenteral challenge with meningococcal polysaccharide in healthy adults.
Article in Clinical and vaccine immunology : CVI, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Persistence of antibodies in laboratory staff immunized with quadrivalent meningococcal polysaccharide vaccine.Journal of occupational medicine and toxicology (London, England) · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Limited data are available on the kinetics of meningococcal serogroup C (MenC)-specific antibody responses following parenteral or nasal challenge in those who have received prior MenC vaccination (polysaccharide or conjugate). Young adults who had previously received either meningococcal A/C polysaccharide (MACP) or MenC conjugate (MCC) vaccine or naïve subjects were challenged with MACP via one of two routes, nasal or parenteral. Blood samples were taken prevaccination and on days 1 to 4 and day 10 postvaccination. MenC serum bactericidal antibody (SBA) and MenC-specific IgG were measured. Following parenteral challenge, MenC SBA and IgG responses were seen to occur between 4 and 7 days postchallenge. A lower proportion of subjects responded following nasal challenge, with naïve subjects showing little change in SBA geometric mean titer (GMT) and IgG geometric mean concentration (GMC) over the 10 days following challenge. Increases in SBA GMTs were seen between 4 and 7 days after nasal challenge in those who had received prior MCC and between 7 and 10 days in those who had received prior MACP, and the responses in the prior-MACP group were of lower magnitude than the responses of the prior-MCC group. The data presented here indicate that, following MCC vaccination, memory has been induced at the mucosal level, and these subjects were able to respond with increases in SBA levels. These results demonstrate that the speed of response (primary or secondary) to challenge with MenC polysaccharide via the nasal or parenteral route does not differ and support concerns that immunological memory alone is too slow to provide protection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.