Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21248099›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2011

The rtxA toxin gene of Kingella kingae: a pertinent target for molecular diagnosis of osteoarticular infections.

Philippe Lehours, Anne-Marie Freydière, Olivier Richer, Christophe Burucoa, Sandrine Boisset, Philippe Lanotte, Marie Françoise Prère, Agnès Ferroni, Christine Lafuente, Francois Vandenesch and 2 more

Open access · greenAbstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
6.8field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 67 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Current research in microbial sciences · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. TheInfection and immunity · 2023
    Article
  5. DistinguishingMicroorganisms · 2022
    Article
  6. Pharyngeal Colonization byMicroorganisms · 2022
    Review
  7. Microorganisms · 2022
    Review
  8. First report ofThe Pan African medical journal · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Kingella kingae: carriage, transmission, and disease.Clinical microbiology reviews · 2015
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Philippe LehoursCHU de Bordeaux, Hopital Pellegrin, Laboratoire de Bactériologie, Bordeaux, France.
Anne-Marie Freydière
Olivier Richer
Christophe Burucoa
Sandrine Boisset
Philippe Lanotte
Marie Françoise Prère
Agnès Ferroni
Christine Lafuente
Francois Vandenesch
Francis Mégraud
Armelle Ménard
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Bordeaux · FRHospices Civils de Lyon · FRHôpital Pellegrin · FRAssistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris · FRBretonneau Hospital · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Poitiers · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Toulouse · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Kingella kingae is an emerging osteoarticular pathogen in young children. Its isolation by traditional culture methods remains difficult, underscoring the need to implement other diagnostic methods for its detection and identification, such as nucleic acid amplification tests. Although the genome of this bacterium has not yet been sequenced, a toxin named RTX has been identified. The goal of this study was to develop sensitive, specific, and rapid molecular methods based on the rtxA toxin gene sequence to diagnose this infection. Two real-time PCR assays (SYBR green and TaqMan chemistries) targeting this gene are reported. Sensitivity and specificity were first evaluated successfully with 67 strains: 31 Kingella kingae isolates and 36 strains from other bacterial species. Then, 52 clinical specimens positive or negative by culture and/or PCR (16S rRNA and cpn60 genes) were tested with these assays. A nested PCR assay with subsequent sequencing was also developed to confirm the presence of Kingella kingae isolates in these clinical specimens. The results obtained demonstrate that these assays are accurate for the diagnosis of Kingella kingae infection.

Indexed as

Bacterial ToxinsBacteriological TechniquesClinical Laboratory TechniquesDNA, BacterialHumansKingella kingaeMolecular Sequence DataNeisseriaceae InfectionsOsteoarthritisPolymerase Chain ReactionSensitivity and SpecificitySequence Analysis, DNABacterial ToxinsDNA, Bacterial

Identifiers

PMID21248099
PMCPMC3122863
OpenAlexW2149135373

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.