Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21247963›Full record

ArticleDevelopment (Cambridge, England)2011

Minor change, major difference: divergent functions of highly conserved cis-regulatory elements subsequent to whole genome duplication events.

Debbie K Goode, Heather A Callaway, Gustavo A Cerda, Katharine E Lewis, Greg Elgar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Development (Cambridge, England), 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Identification and characterization of Hand2 upstream genomic enhancers active in developing stomach and limbs.Developmental dynamics : an official publication of the American Association of Anatomists · 2024
    Article
  2. A novel conserved enhancer at zebrafish zic3 and zic6 loci drives neural expression.Developmental dynamics : an official publication of the American Association of Anatomists · 2019
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Evolution of transcriptional enhancers and animal diversity.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2013
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Regulatory genomics: Insights from the zebrafish.Current topics in genetics · 2012
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Debbie K GoodeDepartment of Physiology Development & Neuroscience, Anatomy Building, Downing Street, Cambridge, UK.
Heather A Callaway
Gustavo A Cerda
Katharine E Lewis
Greg Elgar

Funding

Medical Research Council 72504Medical Research Council G0600877Medical Research Council G0801283Medical Research Council MC_U117597141Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 079971
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Within the vertebrate lineage, a high proportion of duplicate genes have been retained after whole genome duplication (WGD) events. It has been proposed that many of these duplicate genes became indispensable because the ancestral gene function was divided between them. In addition, novel functions may have evolved, owing to changes in cis-regulatory elements. Functional analysis of the PAX2/5/8 gene subfamily appears to support at least the first part of this hypothesis. The collective role of these genes has been widely retained, but sub-functions have been differentially partitioned between the genes in different vertebrates. Conserved non-coding elements (CNEs) represent an interesting and readily identifiable class of putative cis-regulatory elements that have been conserved from fish to mammals, an evolutionary distance of 450 million years. Within the PAX2/5/8 gene subfamily, PAX2 is associated with the highest number of CNEs. An additional WGD experienced in the teleost lineage led to two copies of pax2, each of which retained a large proportion of these CNEs. Using a reporter gene assay in zebrafish embryos, we have exploited this rich collection of regulatory elements in order to determine whether duplicate CNEs have evolved different functions. Remarkably, we find that even highly conserved sequences exhibit more functional differences than similarities. We also discover that short flanking sequences can have a profound impact on CNE function. Therefore, if CNEs are to be used as candidate enhancers for transgenic studies or for multi-species comparative analyses, it is paramount that the CNEs are accurately delineated.

Indexed as

Conserved SequenceGenes, DuplicateAnimalsComputational BiologyEmbryo, NonmammalianEnhancer Elements, GeneticGenes, ReporterGenomePaired Box Transcription FactorsPAX2 Transcription FactorPAX5 Transcription FactorPAX8 Transcription FactorResearchZebrafishZebrafish ProteinsPaired Box Transcription FactorsPAX2 Transcription Factorpax5 protein, zebrafishPAX5 Transcription FactorPax8 protein, zebrafishPAX8 Transcription FactorZebrafish Proteins

Identifiers

PMID21247963
PMCPMC3035092

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.