Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21247955›Full record

ArticleProceedings. Biological sciences2011

Genetic differentiation and the evolution of cooperation in chimpanzees and humans.

Kevin Langergraber, Grit Schubert, Carolyn Rowney, Richard Wrangham, Zinta Zommers, Linda Vigilant

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings. Biological sciences, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
17.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 66 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. The evolution of altruism through war is highly sensitive to population structure and to civilian and fighter mortality.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
  2. Review
  3. The cancellation effect at the group level.Evolution; international journal of organic evolution · 2020
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Variation is the universal: making cultural evolution work in developmental psychology.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2018
    Article
  9. Two types of aggression in human evolution.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2018
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Group augmentation, collective action, and territorial boundary patrols by male chimpanzees.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2017
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Kevin LangergraberPrimatology Department, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Deutscher Platz 6, Leipzig 04103, Germany. langergr@eva.mpg.de
Grit Schubert
Carolyn Rowney
Richard Wrangham
Zinta Zommers
Linda Vigilant
Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology · DEBoston University · USMax Planck Society · DERobert S. Peabody Museum of Archaeology · USUniversity of Oxford · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

It has been proposed that human cooperation is unique among animals for its scale and complexity, its altruistic nature and its occurrence among large groups of individuals that are not closely related or are even strangers. One potential solution to this puzzle is that the unique aspects of human cooperation evolved as a result of high levels of lethal competition (i.e. warfare) between genetically differentiated groups. Although between-group migration would seem to make this scenario unlikely, the plausibility of the between-group competition model has recently been supported by analyses using estimates of genetic differentiation derived from contemporary human groups hypothesized to be representative of those that existed during the time period when human cooperation evolved. Here, we examine levels of between-group genetic differentiation in a large sample of contemporary human groups selected to overcome some of the problems with earlier estimates, and compare them with those of chimpanzees. We find that our estimates of between-group genetic differentiation in contemporary humans are lower than those used in previous tests, and not higher than those of chimpanzees. Because levels of between-group competition in contemporary humans and chimpanzees are also similar, these findings suggest that the identification of other factors that differ between chimpanzees and humans may be needed to provide a compelling explanation of why humans, but not chimpanzees, display the unique features of human cooperation.

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionCooperative BehaviorGenetic VariationAltruismAnimal MigrationAnimalsCompetitive BehaviorCote d'IvoireEmigration and ImmigrationHumansPan troglodytesSocial BehaviorUganda

Identifiers

PMID21247955
PMCPMC3125631
OpenAlexW2131559081

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.