ArticleYeast (Chichester, England)2011
Efficient and rapid exact gene replacement without selection.
Article in Yeast (Chichester, England), 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- mCAL: A New Approach for Versatile Multiplex Action of Cas9 Using One sgRNA and Loci Flanked by a Programmed Target Sequence.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2016Article
- A Tool for Multiple Targeted Genome Deletions that Is Precise, Scar-Free, and Suitable for Automation.PloS one · 2015Article
- KNL1/Spc105 recruits PP1 to silence the spindle assembly checkpoint.Current biology : CB · 2011Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
We describe a highly efficient method for exact gene replacement in budding yeast. Induction of rapid and efficient recombination in an entire cell population results in at least 50% of the recombinants undergoing a switch of the endogenous copy to a specific mutated allele, with no remaining markers or remnant of foreign DNA, without selection. To accomplish this, a partial copy of the replacement allele, followed by an HO cut site, is installed adjacent to the wild-type locus, in a GAL-HO MATa-inc background. HO induction results in near-quantitative site cleavage and recombination/gene conversion, resulting in either regeneration of wild-type or switch of the endogenous allele to the mutant, with accompanying deletion of intervening marker sequences, yielding an exact replacement. Eliminating the need for selection (over days) of rare recombinants removes concerns about second-site suppressor mutations and also allows direct phenotypic analysis, even of lethal gene replacements, without the need of a method to make the lethality conditional or to employ regulated promoters of unknown strength compared to the endogenous promoter. To test this method, we tried two known lethal gene replacements, substituting the non-essential CDH1 gene with a dominantly lethal version mutated for its Cdk phosphorylation sites and substituting the essential CDC28 gene with two recessively lethal versions, one containing an early stop codon and another inactivating Cdc28 kinase activity. We also tested a gene replacement of unknown phenotypic consequences: replacing the non-essential CLB3 B-type cyclin with a version lacking its destruction box.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.