Trial reportEuropean journal of clinical nutrition2011
Oral probiotics: Lactobacillus sporogenes for prevention of necrotizing enterocolitis in very low-birth weight infants: a randomized, controlled trial.
Trial report in European journal of clinical nutrition, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 66 papers, 27 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
66 citing papers in PubMed, 27 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 161 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pooled it
- Effect of probiotics on necrotizing enterocolitis in preterm infants: a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.BMC pediatrics · 2025Pooled it
- Probiotics for preventing neonatal sepsis in preterm neonates: a systematic review and meta-analysis for clinical practice.Epidemiology and health · 2025Pooled it
- Bifidobacterium infantis as a probiotic in preterm infants: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Pediatric research · 2023Pooled it
- Growth and neuro-developmental outcomes of probiotic supplemented preterm infants-a systematic review and meta-analysis.European journal of clinical nutrition · 2023Pooled it
- Probiotics to prevent necrotising enterocolitis in very preterm or very low birth weight infants.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2023Pooled it
- Probiotics for the prevention of mortality and sepsis in preterm very low birth weight neonates from low- and middle-income countries: a Bayesian network meta-analysis.Frontiers in nutrition · 2023Pooled it
- Oral Administration of Probiotics Reduces Chemotherapy-Induced Diarrhea and Oral Mucositis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Frontiers in nutrition · 2022Pooled it
- Probiotic Supplementation for Promotion of Growth in Children: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Nutrients · 2021Pooled it
- [Efficacy of probiotics in preventing late-onset sepsis in very low birth weight infants: a Meta analysis].Zhongguo dang dai er ke za zhi = Chinese journal of contemporary pediatrics · 2021Pooled it
- Evidence-based interventions to reduce mortality among preterm and low-birthweight neonates in low-income and middle-income countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMJ global health · 2021Pooled it
- Probiotics for Preventing Necrotizing Enterocolitis in Preterm Infants: A Network Meta-Analysis.Nutrients · 2021Pooled it
- Probiotics to prevent necrotising enterocolitis in very preterm or very low birth weight infants.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2020Pooled it
- AGA Technical Review on the Role of Probiotics in the Management of Gastrointestinal Disorders.Gastroenterology · 2020Guideline
- Probiotics Reduce Mortality and Morbidity in Preterm, Low-Birth-Weight Infants: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis of Randomized Trials.Gastroenterology · 2020Pooled it
- Bifidobacterium and Lactobacillus for preventing necrotizing enterocolitis in very-low-birth-weight preterm infants: a systematic review and meta-analysis.World journal of pediatrics : WJP · 2020Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Probiotic strategies to prevent necrotizing enterocolitis in preterm infants: a meta-analysis.Pediatric surgery international · 2019Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Pooled it
6 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND/
objectiveThe identification of probiotic species involved in gut homeostasis and their potential therapeutic benefits have led to an interest in their use for preventing necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC). Although bifidobacterium and lactobacilli sp. have been used to reduce the incidence of NEC in clinical trials. Lactobacillus sporogenes has not been used in the prevention of NEC in very low-birth weight infants yet. The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of orally administered L sporogenes in reducing the incidence and severity of NEC in very low-birth weight (VLBW) infants. SUBJECTS/
methodsA prospective, blinded, randomized controlled trial was conducted in preterm infants with a gestational age of <33 weeks or birth weight of <1500 g. VLBW infants who survived to start enteral feeding were randomized into two groups The infants in the study group were given L. sporogenes with a dose of 350,000,000 c.f.u. added to breast milk or formula, once a day, starting with the first feed until discharged. The infants in the control group were fed without L. sporogenes supplementation. The primary outcome measurement was death or NEC (Bell's stage ≥2).
resultsA total of 221 infants were studied: 110 in the study group and 111 in the control group. There was no significant difference in the incidence of death or NEC between the groups. Feeding intolerance was significantly lower in the probiotics group than in the control group (44.5% (n: 49) vs 63.1% (n: 70), respectively; P=0.006).
conclusionsL. sporogenes supplementation at the dose of 350,000,000 c.f.u/day is not effective in reducing the incidence of death or NEC in VLBW infants, however, it could improve the feeding tolerance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.